Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5 arcade gems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete under G5 by RHaworth. (non-admin closure) Altamel (talk) 03:10, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

5 arcade gems

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is in no way notable: there are no references to prove notability. This doesn't warrant a separate article either. st170e^talk 16:33, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - Discussion is a loss of time. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 16:40, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Games don't fall under a speedy deletion criterion st170e^talk 17:48, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As it happens it was created by a block evading sock puppet, so it could probably be speedily deleted. PhilKnight (talk) 19:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you PhilKnight. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 19:05, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 21:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.