Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3SwitcheD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Reality Pump Studios. (non-admin closure) — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3SwitcheD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Discussed notability at Talk:3SwitcheD but don't feel it is resolved. The Gamercast article is something towards notability, as it is a review; the other two references don't seem to be reliable reviews. It is unclear that this is more than a run-of-the-mill computer game.Sending WP:APPNOTE to X201. Boleyn (talk) 12:53, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There's another review on Inside Mac Games [1] but at least one more would be needed for notability. Colapeninsula (talk) 13:02, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) X201 (talk) 14:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Boleyn: I tagged it because of the state it was in - it hasn't improved much since. Sources may come to light during this discussion, but at the moment my opinion, in order of preference, is Move to Draft followed by Delete - X201 (talk) 14:06, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Reality Pump Studios. (edit conflict) If the subject is a valid search term, and it is, redirection to the dev article is always preferred to deletion. Redirects are cheap. As it stands, this article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search (main hits: [2][3]—not enough). Please {{ping}} me you find more (non-English and offline) sources. – czar 14:07, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
COmment Czar's proposal looks like a good idea. Boleyn (talk) 15:29, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 19:15, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Swarm ♠ 01:31, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 01:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per above.--Vaypertrail (talk) 14:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.