Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Cuatro Vientos crash
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 05:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- 2013 Cuatro Vientos crash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:AIRCRASH. Not notable aviation accident.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William 09:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. ...William 09:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William 09:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC) ...William 09:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. czar · · 10:58, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
*Merge and redirect to List of air show accidents and incidents.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per my original prod as just not notable (already mentioned on List of air show accidents and incidents so doenst really need a merge). MilborneOne (talk) 13:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the mention in List of air show accidents and incidents is sufficient. What else can be said about this? Jezhotwells (talk) 14:30, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The mention was insufficient, e.g. failing to mention secondary victims, but should be now.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Hence, I now support Delete.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 19:43, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – agree with Jezhotwells. — Lfdder (talk) 19:36, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this article is non-notable at all. Agree with Jezhotwells too.L. Zheng Wei (talk) 6:25, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I also agree with Jezhotwells. Not notable and has received no coverage across the world. Fails WP:AIRCRASH as well. Springyboy (talk) 22:22, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It had a large coverage in Spain. The pilot was a notable person and thousands of people saw the accident in the place. Some people were injured. After the accident, controversy rose about security planning in the airport. - Joxemai (talk) 12:12, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It had coverage across Europe and the pilot was experienced. There were lots of people who saw the accident and there were injuries. Jrmrbr (talk) 16:51, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Jezhotwells →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 23:42, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Pilot was not Wikinotable (being an unspecified assistant to the Minister is not notability); while a tragic accident, this does not rise to the level required for notability. WP:TOOSOON at best. - The Bushranger One ping only 16:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.