Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012: Supernova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:42, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2012: Supernova

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see blog-like reviews and streaming sites, but not enough evidence of notability; all I found was this review. The only source is a review with no actual review. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:16, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Besides the Horror News Net review, there is also one at Blu-ray.com [[1]]. Both sites are RS.Donaldd23 (talk) 02:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - some coverage can be found that can satisfy keeping it, although sounds like a pretty bad movie. Kolma8 (talk) 16:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Trashy Asylum movie, but the coverage is okay. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 19:37, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:57, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.