Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1000Fryd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1000Fryd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notalbe building, can't seem to find references to suggest notability JayJay^{Talk to me} 22:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment From all the concerts by famous talent, and it being mentioned in a novel, one might expect the sort of coverage which would contribute to satisfying WP:N. Are there any sources in Danish? Edison (talk) 03:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:36, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:36, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I found some sources about the novel and the major role the establishment plays in it, and a raft of news stories about vandalism and fights there. I'll expand the article a little bit and add refs, over the next few days. There appears to be some reliably sourced material on their promotion of alternative music, although I could search better on that if I knew diddly-squat about popular music '-) It'll be a pity if most of the references are about disturbances, but from what I've seen plus its important role in the book, in my estimation it meets the threshhold for general notability. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:50, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.