User talk:ZKang123
| This is ZKang123's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Invitation to Singapore August 2025 meetup
[edit]Hello,
It is August 2025!
At Wikimania 2025 in Nairobi, Kenya, User:Robertsky was recognised as the Wikimedian of the Year. Known for his kindness, dedication and willingness to help others, Robert embodies the spirit of the Wikimedia movement.
Read more at diff blog about his journey as an editor and seven other Wikimedians identified for their contributions to the movement.
Our next meetup is taking place at Bistro8@Foch Road on 16 August 2025, 12:00 PM - 3:00 PM. It will be a lunch meetup. Full details and the registration form can be found at Event:Singapore Meetup August 2025. Some topics of discussion will be Wikimania 2025, and future plans for Wikimedia Singapore. We’d love to see you there!
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Warm regards,
– robertsky (talk) 02:05, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi ZKang123. Thank you for your work on Cycling in Singapore. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for taking the time to create the article! Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 13:16, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
October 2025 GAN Backlog Drive
[edit]
| |
| If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:57, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
Your nomination of 2024 East–West Line disruption is under review
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article 2024 East–West Line disruption is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 13:33, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
Your nomination of Punggol LRT line is under review
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Punggol LRT line is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Icepinner -- Icepinner (talk) 00:10, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
Your nomination of Punggol LRT line is on hold
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Punggol LRT line has been placed
on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Icepinner -- Icepinner (talk) 14:23, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
Your nomination of Punggol LRT line has passed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Punggol LRT line has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Icepinner -- Icepinner (talk) 10:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Rollback granted
[edit]
Hi ZKang123. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
- Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
- Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! Malinaccier (talk) 13:48, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Tang Liang Hong
[edit]On 7 October 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tang Liang Hong, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 04:24, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Punggol LRT line
[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Punggol LRT line at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:44, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Your nomination of 2024 East–West Line disruption has passed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article 2024 East–West Line disruption has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 04:06, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 21 § Category:Swedish novels by year
[edit]Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 21 § Category:Swedish novels by year on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 12:12, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
GAN of Trump Tower Belgrade
[edit]I wanted to point out that your concerns around the apparent newness of this article and its ability to withstand GAN have merit. Those issues being: that the site is not even built yet, and also the developing nature of the legal issues surrounding Goran Vasic, the director of the cultural institute charged with abuse of power, which the article does not even currently mention. (It does state that he was arrested, but not that he has been charged by a prosecutor). I foresee this article having recurring issues in keeping up-to-date with information, particularly when that information speaks detrimentally to the site's ultimate construction.
It should be noted that the nominator has had issues with premature article creation in the recent past although those issues were dealt with then (and thus, the editor is currently free from any editing restrictions) but it still stands to mention as an issue with regards to the editor generally putting their cart before the horse, so to speak. Regards, Spintendo 19:57, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for raising this. I also felt it's certainly premature and I'm glad you are able to back me up, also pointing out there's actually other coverage that has been missed. While there have been a few GAs with new infrastructure being under construction, I doubt the article would be stable to withstand future updates, and could risk a fail if the article is not kept to standard. There needs to be a sign of future-proofing, and yeah, I doubt it could.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 00:36, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding repeated reversions
[edit]@ZKang123: I'd like to thank you for your excellent article review of Azalina Othman Said. I really appreciate your suggestions regarding the electoral results section, as I wasn't entirely sure of the best approach to take.
On another note, I wanted to bring to your attention that the user Normal rookie (talk · contribs) has been consistently reverting edits on several GA articles, including both mine and yours on Hannah Yeoh. I have previously warned them about the possibility of an edit war, but the issue has persisted. Pangalau (talk) 15:08, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
