User talk:Wikibuff91

Welcome!

Hello, Wikibuff91, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Taylor Auerbach, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MikeWazowski (talk) 03:50, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Taylor Auerbach

The article Taylor Auerbach has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. MikeWazowski (talk) 03:50, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 October 31#OTRS pending since long ago, edited in May. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:40, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Sunday Telegraph (Sydney) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Sunday Telegraph (Sydney) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sunday Telegraph (Sydney) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 22:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Wikibuff91. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Taylor Auerbach, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) 20:52, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taylor Auerbach for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taylor Auerbach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Auerbach until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Laun chba ller 22:59, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:James Madden, from its old location at User:Wikibuff91/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 13:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Madden (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Madden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 13:28, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikibuff91! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 13:28, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Madden (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Old-AgedKid was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Australian sources where the journalist worked are not reliable

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Madden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Old-AgedKid (talk) 15:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please take note that if you submit this again, I will report the matter at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, suggesting that you be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not a platform for trolling, and nor is it a platform for individuals to further external conflicts with each other. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:59, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AndyTheGrump - I'm hurt and offended that you feel that way - and you are mistaken. I don't know what has led you to that misapprehension. In any case, links/citations have been provided, including to documents tendered in the Australian Parliament by under powers conferred by The Constitution of Australia. I trust, respectfully, you will appreciate that this is an appropriate response to concerns raised by you (et al). Wikibuff91 (talk) 16:18, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My previous statement stands. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your 'previous statement', 'stands', nowhere except that I reserve my rights to rely on it (and all your statements) in all respects and in any forum. Wikibuff91 (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And I further note, and put you on notice, that the description of your activities on Wikipedia being confined to: 'Only editing occasionally. Mostly just to annoy people who would prefer I wasn't editing at all. They know who they are...' will also be relied on. Please advise at your earliest convenience if you are not the author of the comments in quotation marks in the previous sentence. Wikibuff91 (talk) 16:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Further, AndyTheGrump, in respect of your baseless threats to me to report 'the matter' to 'Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents' suggesting that I be 'blocked from editing' (inter alia), I reserve my rights in all respects. Wikibuff91 (talk) 16:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These have been updated to include official documents tendered to the Federal Parliament of Australia under The Constitution. Wikibuff91 (talk) 16:13, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Reliable sources for some helpful information. Please also stop using the unhelpful quasi-legalistic terminology like "reserve my rights" or you likely will be blocked for making legal threats. Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) 17:46, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Liance. I noticed that you recently removed content from Taylor Auerbach without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Liance^talk 15:35, 2 April 2025 (UTC)== Notification ==[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of an attack page

A page you created has been deleted as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:24, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Taylor Auerbach) for disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:37, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As you have responded to this by making legal threats, I am increasing the block to site-wide. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:51, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ritchie333 - you are a hero - I hope you find joy, and most of all I wish, you love xx Wikibuff91 (talk) 15:53, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You'll be glad to know that Ritchie333 is one of our most trusted and respected editors, but after your overt legal threat, the line of admins wanting to block this account was long and distinguished. Won't see you later! BusterD (talk) 16:35, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]