User talk:Wiki Operator Bob

       ✉️ Wiki Operator Bob: Incoming Transmissions

Welcome to my talk page. If you have questions regarding my recent edits or need assistance with a technical task, please leave a message below.

           1. Start a New Thread
Click the "Add topic" tab at the top of this page.

           2. Sign Your Posts
Always end your messages with four tildes: Wiki Operator Bob (talk) 14:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

           3. Response Time
I usually respond within 24–48 hours.

   Archive 1 • All Subpages

New Messages Below

February 2026

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Concert of Requests. When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:39, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Death Dimension, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 17:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lifetime Enclosures

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Lifetime Enclosures, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 17:39, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Walmart

Hello Wiki Operator Bob, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Walmart, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:19, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note - Nonsense speedy deletion nominations like this are disruptive. Don't do it again. And to be clear, this sort of nonsense is also not acceptable. -- Whpq (talk) 21:23, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Almond Cow (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ChrysGalley were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

And it reads like an advertisement. Without proper sourcing we can't evaluate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Almond Cow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ChrysGalley (talk) 21:09, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wiki Operator Bob! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 21:09, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to World War I

Hello there

I reverted your template stating that the article is "full of incorrect information" because it isn't helpful. If the article contains information you think is incorrect, correct it and add reliable sources. If you think there are multiple examples of incorrect information, list them on Talk and I would be happy to share with you the job of correcting them.

Thanks Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 01:39, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Almond Cow (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AllWeKnowOfHeaven was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Almond Cow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 19:42, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]