User talk:WikiCommanderInChief

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

November 2025

Hello, I'm Lynch44. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Newbies have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Lynch 44 18:22, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i am sorry. I was just trying to make a redirect. Please help me find the link for that. WikiCommanderInChief (talk) 18:25, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to User:Jimbo Wales, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 01:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I am sorry :( WikiCommanderInChief (talk) 01:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have also removed misleading templates from your talk page, your page is not protected, and a /Unprotected is completely unnecessary. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 01:28, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok I just don't want to get vandalized this user page took forever WikiCommanderInChief (talk) 01:28, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:WikiCommanderInChief, you may be blocked from editing. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 02:12, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok srry WikiCommanderInChief (talk) 02:13, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oh no

it deleted everything I didn't know oh nononononono WikiCommanderInChief (talk) 01:15, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:WikiCommanderInChief

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:WikiCommanderInChief, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (I fight vandals bro I just made a fancy name for myself) --WikiCommanderInChief (talk) 02:03, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What vandals have you fought? --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 02:11, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

saying my mission is to fight vandalsm

WikiCommanderInChief (talk) 02:12, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Lofty abyss 02:22, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WikiCommanderInChief! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore your preferred version of User talk:WikiCommanderInChief. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at User talk:WikiCommanderInChief, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 02:33, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are clearly not here to create an encyclopedia. That's what you should be doing here. This is not a social media playground for you to use. You may be a volunteer here, and you are not paid, but that does not mean you can do just anything. Get to work or leave. That may sound harsh, but you need to be more serious about this. When you join the community of editors here, we all work together to create and improve content. We also have a relaxed attitude and can tolerate some banter and personal talk on user pages, but you don't seem to have your main focus on the encyclopedia, so what else you do seems to be getting in the way of that. Change your focus and then some social interactions will follow naturally, but still with a common focus on the encyclopedia. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 02:36, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder how the troll will work if he's been indeffed? There's no chance this editor cuts out their BS shtick and miraculously decides to make a thoughtful plea for being allowed to edit constructively. Barnt Toust 02:41, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]