User talk:Utibe Noah Silas

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
575	Viborg FF (talk)	Add sources
6	Wyoming Department of Family Services (talk)	Add sources
128	NSW Cup (talk)	Add sources
124	Wyoming House of Representatives (talk)	Add sources
62	Universiti Utara Malaysia (talk)	Add sources
27	Wyoming Republican Party (talk)	Add sources
12	Cheyenne Central High School (talk)	Cleanup
164	Maxime Vachier-Lagrave (talk)	Cleanup
82	Lex Gillette (talk)	Cleanup
1,196	World Athletics U20 Championships (talk)	Expand
49	Women's suffrage in Wyoming (talk)	Expand
74	Lucyna Kornobys (talk)	Expand
25	Armande Béjart (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
805	Luigi (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
177	Pope Shenouda III of Alexandria (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
4	2002 Westminster City Council election (talk)	Merge
1,554	MiHoYo (talk)	Merge
38	Second Kishida Cabinet (talk)	Merge
14	Maor Buzaglo (talk)	Wikify
759	History of Egypt (talk)	Wikify
5	Evalyn Parry (talk)	Wikify
2	Loraine Rollins (talk)	Orphan
2	Lynn E. Dickey (talk)	Orphan
2	Virginia L. Wright (talk)	Orphan
3	Robin Wettlaufer (talk)	Stub
71	Ali Can Özcan (talk)	Stub
59	Xiao Xiang-wen (talk)	Stub
21	Yuliya Bakastova (talk)	Stub
53	Chuck Gray (Wyoming politician) (talk)	Stub
82	Anna Hontar (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to 1979 Pacific typhoon season, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 01:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I actually noticed but Didn't know how to roll back, at least not yet. if you do kindly intimate me. i really appreciate you noticing. Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 01:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm OzzyOlly. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Holocaust in Hungary without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. OzzyOlly (talk) 03:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so sorry about this, I think this was a big mistake. nothing was removed intentionally on the said article. i am being very careful as a new editor. thank you for bring this up. I appreciate and will be more careful going forward Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 21:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Star Wolf (novel series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Star Wolf. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That's noted going forward Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 09:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

African Legislators in Red Contest 2024

You're invited to join the African Legislators in Red from 9 December 2024 to 9 January 2024.

Join African Legislators in Red, an initiative dedicated to creating and editing Wikipedia articles on African legislators to ensure their legacies are preserved and celebrated.

Sign up for this contest by listing your username under the participants section.

The following prizes will be awarded at the end of the contest.

Overall winner - ₦100,000
Runner-up - ₦70,000
Second runner-up - ₦50,000

For more information concerning the contest and how to fully participate, visit the contest page by clicking here.

Together, let’s amplify the voices of African legislators on the global stage!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:PRINCE-ANIEFIOK OKON ATTAH

Hello, Utibe Noah Silas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:PRINCE-ANIEFIOK OKON ATTAH, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:10, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:PRINCE-ANIEFIOK OKON ATTAH

Hello, Utibe Noah Silas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "PRINCE-ANIEFIOK OKON ATTAH".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:25, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you are welcome Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 11:26, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Images and captions

Hi Utibe Noah Silas, you are adding images to articles, that's a good idea. However, please take care of the captions. E.g., "Plate 38 (Garth, 1958) (cropped)" is not a proper caption. Also, it may be a good idea to move the images to the box if there is one in the article. See, e.g., here. --Cyfal (talk) 21:31, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thank for this guide. I really appreciate this hint. I will follow this correction. However, I crave your continuous guidance until I become the best at this. Please should you notice any other mistake, pleas know they are not intentional. I will keep correcting as they come up while striving to keep improving. Again Thank you so much Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 21:36, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Theater District - panoramio" is also a bad caption. You generally shouldn't just use the filename as the caption. It is not relevant to Wikipedia's usage of the photo that this file was once hosted on a website called Panoramio. Belbury (talk) 14:20, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok. pls educate me. This picture was suggested to be used for this article and because Understandably I don't know much about the building, so using the file name as a known caption is only common-sensical. In a situation where I encounter this again what do you suggest as a better approach??

I really want to learn so I await your kind response please Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 14:32, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Captions for how to write a good caption.

If you don't know what a picture is depicting, you should research its description and categories on Commons, or just find a different picture. Belbury (talk) 15:26, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 16:03, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One additional remark on captions: The latin name of plants and animals (constisting of genus and species) are spelled in italics, e.g., see my modification here. More about this can be found at MOS:ORGANISMS. --Cyfal (talk) 18:03, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 18:22, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image choices

Hi there, you asked on my talk page if using the first picture suggested on the toolforge list is grounds for reverting and said that you use only the first picture as suggested and wouldn't intentionally use a wrong picture for an article.

Any reverts you're experiencing should have edit summaries saying why they were reverted, you can see this if you click the "View history" tab on a page.

I reverted your addition of File:F805 Evertsen.jpg to the Operation Ocean Shield article because the Operation Ocean Shield article doesn't appear to mention the F805 Evertsen at any point. It's quite possible that the first picture suggested on Toolforge isn't actually a useful one! I don't know what Toolforge is, but it may just be taking the image from Wikidata - and Wikidata is written by humans who sometimes make mistakes (and can also be vandalised by people introducing deliberate errors).

If you don't personally know whether a picture is relevant to an article, you should not add it. Belbury (talk) 15:22, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. However, I will keep improving. Should you see any similar mistakes going forward, please know they are not intentional Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 16:06, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos 2025

As noted above by other users, please take care when adding images to articles. If more complaints persist, you would be disqualified for disruptive editing. I’ve made some corrections to your captions (including using non-English sentences). Please before you continue, go back to your contributions and check for these mistakes. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 17:53, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans Okay thank you for the feedback my mentor. I will pause here and evaluate my contributions so far. I

please note that if there are observable mistakes, particularly with the non-english sentences, they're not intentional. It's the fun of contributing within amble free time now that I'm done with my semester work that's my motivation not the prizes. I will soon resume next semester work and will not have time to contribute. I plead to be understood, guided and encouraged particularly having not contributed for a long time as a new editor Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 18:08, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Silas. Thank you for your contributions so far, happy to see you improve more! Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 18:26, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans I appreciate this coming from you boss. Another thing pls clarify me. I used to think that disruptive editing means one makes more mistakes than productive edits. would you say that's the case with me so far?

if your answer comes back affirmative, I will sincerely stop contributing to this amazing wpwp project as I have no intentions to edit disruptively or get blocked in the process.

I really want to contribute to wpwp. let me know if I should continue. As it's already obvious, I am really enjoying this wpwp project more than any other projects so far that why, I really want to guided on ways I can better channel this new found passion of mine please.

I will appreciate all hints in this regards my boss.

Best regards Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 18:39, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing means that you’re not taking back criticism and making amendments but that’s not entirely the case with you, I’m sorry for using that word. Your works are a lot more productive and I appreciate the works you do here! Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 18:55, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans Thank you so much boss. you're indeed the best. Now I can sleep. Thank you.

However, I will match breaks so I can evaluate and watch if we have further corrections then I can pick up from there.

Again Thank you sir for taking the time. I really appreciate Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 19:12, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, take your time. Happy editing! Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 19:49, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Evening My Distinguished Boss. Please having waited a while. I feel the urge to continue with the WPWP project having learnt so much so as to avoid any kind of disruptive editing Going forward. However, I want you to assess my overall work so far and please advice if I should continue or relent completely. I count on your wisdom and guidance please as my mentor sir. Your response will assist my next decision greatly. Thank you in anticipation Boss Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 18:37, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning Silas and a happy Sunday! I came to say that you’re doing a nice job! Kudos! Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 11:31, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans I'm happy to hear. this is very encouraging. Thank you. Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 17:49, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tarabina Biweribo (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It needs more reliable and independent references to the subject. Please add 2 more references similar to ref 1 to address WP:THREE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Utibe Noah Silas/Tarabina Biweribo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 14:39, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Utibe Noah Silas! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fade258 (talk) 14:39, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gbolagade Adelowo (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gbolagade Adelowo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:33, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pythoncoder Thank you. will work on all observations and revert. Thank you for all you do Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 10:20, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pitcairners

Thanks for your efforts to improve articles on Pitcairners by adding photos. Unfortunately I think they are mostly copyright violations and will shortly be deleted from Commons. Number 5 7 20:51, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello, I'm Fram. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jason F. Wright have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Fram (talk) 11:12, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram I appreciate your work. pls know that the observed errors are not intentional as they're a product of a wrongly generated list of suggested inclusion.

I have noticed this particular applies to the part of the list I used today. I promise to skip this part of the list totally.

Thank you for understanding Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 11:34, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are responsible for what you insert, not some list you may use from somewhere. You need to check that the image is depciting the same subject as the one in the article. I only gave you a warning for this one as it was extremely obvious, but there are too many errors in your work in general. I see that these issuse aren't new and that you have been warned about incorrect images in the past as well. I would urge you to be a lot more careful if you don't want to be topic banned from such additions. Fram (talk) 11:37, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram Quite a very discouraging remarks there. I think I'm pausing my contributions for now as I don't intend my good efforts to be a product of an aggressive ban whatever the category as none of the noticed mistakes are ever intentional.

while we contribute to Wikipedia, one should not be expected to know independently exact image of subjects based on personal opinions but should base accuracy on the veracity of other contributors work as have been allowed already on wikicommons which is what I did. You're within your rights to reverts once mistakes are observed which is inevitable but to condemn sincere efforts seems too aggressive and ill motivated. Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 11:46, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

E.g. File:William Young.jpg, which you added here, is not a Commons file, and is not included in his Wikidata entry either. "one should not be expected to know independently exact image of subjects based on personal opinions but should base accuracy on the veracity of other contributors work" My reverts have nothing to do with "personal opinions" but with the description of the image or date not matching the subject. This is just not a normal image for someone born in 1940, so it was immediately clear that this needed extra checking. Do you actually look at the images you add? The cat one that lead to this warning seems to suggest you don't. Fram (talk) 11:57, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram I had a glitch while working this morning and I intend to trace it. I won't on a normal circumstance add a cat to a human name. this is clearly a revert I appreciated but your choice of words seem to indicate that all my edits some of which I have received many thanks recently are suddenly erroneous.

pls go through my work again and check if you would see similar mistakes. your sudden generalization of my work is what I don't appreciate.

Please know I left my PC in a crowded work space, and it's obvious someone else worked on it so I wouldn't know how an image of a cat found it's way to my edits.

I apologize if that is so and plead to be understood on the basis of my excellent inputs recently not condemned for a single mistake that is a product of a glitch or wrong hands handling my system. I sincerely will be more careful going forward.

thank you for all you do. Please go through all my work and reassess me. I want to trust your review because if what you said is true, then your recent view on my work could as well be an angered response at the instance of what you noticed.

Thank you for an underserved Understanding. Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 12:15, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't lie. Don't pretend someone else made that edit. It's a ridiculous excuse. Fram (talk) 12:26, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram Your ability to have assumed I'm lying is preposterous and unreasonable particularly as I'm not with reference to the cat image.

All my edits are done from this list https://fist.toolforge.org/wd4wp/#/enwiki/133440 and seeing I don't know any one of the subjects. I base my choice on the foremost and best image of the suggested list.

To think I invent the picture I add and I'm lying is clearly the height of assumptions which I seriously don't appreciate as it's not a quality of good editors nor contributors.

you sound biased and eager to proof a point. I just hope you won't revert all my work. Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 12:42, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gbolagade Adelowo (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Vaurie was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gbolagade Adelowo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:25, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Use of AI-upscaled images

Hello! Your image was inserted successfully on the page Mamamoo+, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Wikipedia doesn't use AI upscaled images of people, per MOS:AIUPSCALE. Belbury (talk) 13:08, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 14:05, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Captions

Please provide captions when adding images to articles. It is absolutely useless to the reader to see an image like File:Lathrobium fulvipenne (Gravenhorst, 1806).png on Lathrobiini without knowing what species the image depicts. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:04, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Thank you Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 06:08, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also when adding captions, avoid a caption that just repeats the article title. See the guidelines at MOS:CAPLENGTH. For example the caption might say where the photo was taken. I updated your caption at Gagea altaica. Declangi (talk) 01:26, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 02:05, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After adding an image

After adding an image to an article that doesn't already have one, do update the article's Talk page to remove the "needs-photo" or "needs-image" flag. As I've done here. Thanks, Declangi (talk) 01:31, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I deeply appreciate this guide. Thank you Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 02:05, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Quercus orocantabrica is another Talk page that had a "needs-image" parameter. Declangi (talk) 00:54, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I actually don't know how to do what you ask. I'm still learning. Pls could you send a link where I can learn what you are expecting more effectively? I don't mind taking time from tomorrow to correct pages that have the ''need-image'' issues. Thank you in anticipation of further guidance. Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 03:00, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This diff here is an example. I removed the "needs-photo" parameter. On other articles, the parameter may be called "needs-image". Declangi (talk) 04:58, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly not all article I add new picture need this attention so how do I know the one that needs this additional edit? Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

True, this doesn't apply to all articles. The quick way is to check the article's Talk page for a small camera icon in its assessment box. The page Talk:Acacia benthamii has the camera icon, for example. Declangi (talk) 06:07, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will I just turn the yes to no? However, to reduce the back and forth, I will take time and learn this part from Sept 1st. I appreciate your patience . Thank you for all you do Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 06:16, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, turning the yes to no is one way. Or remove the parameter entirely as I did at Talk:Gagea altaica with this edit. Declangi (talk) 07:38, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 07:40, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Hello! I'm Belbury. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the page Black Hawk (nightclub) have been reverted because they appear to have added incorrect information. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source, discuss it on the article's talk page, or leave me a message on my talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. You added a photo of the corner of Golden Gate and Jones St, which is two blocks away and shows nothing of what would have been the Black Hawk site. Belbury (talk) 17:22, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will send in a more comprehensive response. Thank you for the observation. Utibe Noah Silas (talk) 17:25, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]