User talk:Turkiishh

January 2025

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Isabelle Adjani. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 13:14, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soldan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soldan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Aintabli (talk) 13:57, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Your recent editing history at Turkish Americans shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 14:01, 23 May 2025 (UTC) —[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. An edit that you recently made to Banque Misr seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jessicapierce (talk) 17:13, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm AndreJustAndre. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Crimean Karaites, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andre🚐 19:22, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits in Oirats

hey! this message is to highlight your recent edits at Oirats page. now, Volga Kalmyks do have a page, its a name for Kalmyks (See here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378583168_Kalmyki_Povolza_i_kazahi_k_istorii_ih_vzaimootnosenij_v_XVIII_-_nacale_XIX_vliving) around the Volga. Regarding the following edit, the Oirots were recognised as a nation and had a national oblast, namely the Oirot Autonomous Oblast, with its capital of Oirot-Tura. The Southern Altaian people were included in the Oirat Khanate and preceding polities, like Four Oirats. Lastly, they were likely mentioned among the forest peoples in the Secret History of Mongols. I would like to find a solution that satisfies both sides, and to hear your reasons for objection. Vofa (talk) 20:06, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism in Merkit

hey! this message is to highlight your recent vandalism on the Merkit page. please explain your previous actions, and do not revert several peoples contributions without explanations. if you respond, sources will be provided. as a general rule, try to seek consensus before changes. Vofa (talk) 03:43, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bit ironic to see you warn others about vandalism and consensus, considering that you’ve repeatedly removed reliably sourced content from the Merkit article (and others) without proper explanation or discussion.

Removing sourced material while labeling it as "fringe" or "unsourced" - when it's clearly backed by academic references - undermines the very policies you're invoking here. KoizumiBS (talk) 07:56, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No need to delete text without reason.

Hello, I'm Strikebella. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Uzbeks have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Strikebella (talk) 05:19, 8 July 2025 (UTC) (unintentional vandalism/test)[reply]