User talk:Technology 2025

Welcome!

Hello, Hungryrootwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Magnolia677 (talk) 21:01, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Section headers

Section headers should be in sentence case, not title case. See MOS:HEADCAPS. ... discospinster _talk 21:05, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hungryroot (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:NCORP) but presently it is not clear that it does.

As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. In short, "notability" requires reliable sources about the subject, rather than by the subject. Please note that many of the references would appear to be from sources that are NOT considered reliable for establishing notability and should be removed (including blogs, company websites, press releases, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, Spotify etc). Please note that the references are not formatted correctly (see Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor and Wikipedia’s Manual of Style for help). Additionally, the draft tends to read too much like an advertorial, which Wikipedia is not; and contains prose that is not of a standard appropriate for an encyclopaedia (also see WP:PEACOCK). Thank you for declaring your conflict of interest here, and on your User Page. Please note that COIs should be declared on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NCORP criteria #3, because XXXXX").

Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hungryroot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 02:23, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hungryrootwiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 02:23, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Cabayi (talk) 07:36, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hungryroot

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Hungryroot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:47, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Technology 2025 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

technology_2025 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand that my previous edits were promotional in tone and that my username violated Wikipedia’s policies by appearing to represent a company rather than an individual. I am employed by Hungryroot and was attempting to improve the article about the company, but I now understand that Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion, and that articles must meet notability, neutrality, and verifiability standards.

I have reviewed and will adhere to the following policies: WP:NOTPROMO, WP:COI, WP:USERNAME, WP:GNG, and WP:NPOV.

If unblocked, I will change my username to **technology_2025**, and I will contribute constructively, focusing on neutral, well-sourced edits, and proposing changes on article talk pages if they concern subjects where I have a conflict of interest.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Decline reason:

According to ZeroGOT, this unblock request is 100% AI-generated. Given that you are blocked (not ChatGPT), we are interested in hearing from you. Unblock requests must reflect your own understanding of the block and your willingness to follow Wikipedia’s policies going forward. Because this request does not demonstrate that you understand why you were blocked or how you plan to change your editing behavior, the request is declined. You are welcome to submit a new request written in your own words. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:14, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have renamed your account. A different uninvolved admin will review your unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 17:31, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Significa liberdade,

I appreciate your review and understand why you've denied my request to be unblocked.

I am, in fact, a human (not AI) and I can see how the article came off as promotional, which wasn’t my intention. I was too focused on trying to highlight the company’s positive traits without realizing that it crossed the line for tone and neutrality. I also didn’t pay close enough attention to the kind of sources Wikipedia expects where many of mine weren’t independent or strong enough.

If unblocked, I’ll go back to the draft and rewrite it to be more neutral and factual, and use better third-party sources that actually support notability and remove any sources that do not.

Appreciate your time and re-consideration to unblock so I can make these edits accordingly. Thank you! Technology 2025 (talk) 17:37, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]