User talk:Suphanb
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Suphanb! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Jay8g [V•T•E] 21:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Ramón Flecha
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ramón Flecha. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jay8g [V•T•E] 21:53, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
- Dear Jay8g,
- Nobody explained to me why my contributions were erased, I upgraded the page providing around 30 reliable references. The user SapphoAdhyayana created its account with the only purpose to revert my edition to enforce the outdated hagiographical version, just because he/she does not like what I say, even if this is supported by hundred of reliable references. Please, just check the number of results: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=ramon+flecha+secta
- I completely understand that your position is very uncomfortable, but I consider that Wikipedia cannot collaborate to whitewash a sexual predator.
- Have a nice day, Suphanb (talk) 23:25, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Administrators noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Harmful accusations. 11USA11 (talk) 23:48, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Personal attacks
[edit]Personal attacks on other editors are not permitted on Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia:No personal attacks and stop. Cullen328 (talk) 03:10, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
April 2025
[edit]Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.