User talk:Sterenn.denys

Sandbox article

Hi, I noticed that you've been editing User:Sterenn.denys/sandbox, and I wanted to bring Wikipedia's policy of conflict of interest editing to your attention. Writing about oneself is discouraged on Wikipedia, but if you think an article about yourself should exist, it's best to request that one be created at Articles for Creation. (See also: WP:YOURSELF). If you have any questions, feel free to reach out. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 15:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tpdwkouaa,

Thank you for your message. We are doing our best to respect Wikipedia guidelines. We highly respect your platform and look forward to be part of it. Please note that it is not Sterenn Denys who wrote the article but Michel Blumenthal. If you would like, we can send you a copy of his email with the text inside. Would that help you trusting our good will ?

We understood from your contributor called JohnNewton8 that we needed to add references at the end and that is why the article we published had been deleted recently (dispite multiple hours of hardwork). It is therefor the second time we try to publish it.

We hope that you can appreciate that the article goes beyond the person of Sterenn Denys but offers historical and artistic context with multiple references to valid Wikipedia references.

Please feel free to come back to us anytime to help us to do things perfectly according to your guideline so the article would hopefully stay this time.

Cordially,

--Sterenn.denys (talk) 16:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)Sterenn Denys Team

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sterenn.denys/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Sterenn.denys/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:44, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sterenn.denys! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:44, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 18:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you are Sterenn Denys, you cannot use her name as your username. Please review the policies linked to in the notice above. 331dot (talk) 18:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sterenn Denys

Hello, Sterenn.denys. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sterenn Denys, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sterenn Denys

Hello, Sterenn.denys. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sterenn Denys".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:05, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]