User talk:Spfarrell

This is Spfarrell's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Library Shelfie Day (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Library Shelfie Day and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Library Shelfie Day, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 12:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable Source?

What's a more reliable source than a citation from the organization that conceived of the event? I certainly looked to other sources describing it, including the publications Library Journal & American Libraries, but they refer back to this same citation for their own description. Other references to the event are mostly showcasing the event because they understand that it is a real thing and have been doing so for 8 years now.

Hello, Spfarrell,

Articles accepted into the main space of the project need multiple, independent reliable sources from mainstream media, books, newspaper or academic journals that provide in-depth coverage of the subject. Information given by the subject of the article is not considered independent or neutral.

If you have any more questions about article creation or Wikipedia's policies on notability, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:11, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Library Shelfie Day

Hello, Spfarrell. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Library Shelfie Day, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:04, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susie Meister (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Susie Meister and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 13:59, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spfarrell! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 13:59, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Susie Meister

Hello, Spfarrell. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Susie Meister".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 03:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]