Jump to content

User talk:SanjaykumarMonu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muzcorner (February 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dr. Kadzi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  Kadzi  (talk) 14:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Muzcorner

[edit]

Information icon Hello, SanjaykumarMonu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muzcorner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Draft:Muzcorner, a page that you created, has been deleted. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 03:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, SanjaykumarMonu. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! SanjaykumarMonu, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 03:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Muzcorner, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Johnj1995 (talk) 19:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:SanjaykumarMonu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Johnj1995 (talk) 19:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (It is a legal entity. The company is registered by Government of India under MSME. Also, the company's articles has been recognized by several popular websites like Indiatimes, DowntoEarth, Vapur.us, Sankalptaru and more. Please consider my request to not delete this page.) --SanjaykumarMonu (talk) 19:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

[edit]
Information icon

Hello SanjaykumarMonu. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Muzcorner, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:SanjaykumarMonu. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=SanjaykumarMonu|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Whpq (talk) 19:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1][2] MrOllie (talk) 12:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have added the useful information in the same page that basically explains What type of bicycles strike a balance between road bikes and mountain bikes, combining features from both worlds? and source the page that explains the same in detail. Please help me understand why it is not relevant to the page. Also, firefoxbikes.com is one of the best cycle brands in India. Please take a look at the brand by searching about it on Google. SanjaykumarMonu (talk) 12:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, you've added blatant link spam by using a web store as a citation. You've been adding link spam to most of the pages you edit. It is time to stop doing that. MrOllie (talk) 12:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I do accept that the overall website is an online marketplace for bicycles. However, the information I added is referenced from one of its blog page. SanjaykumarMonu (talk) 12:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A distinction without a difference. We do not use selfpublished blogs as sources, particularly not ones which are marketing materials for web stores. MrOllie (talk) 12:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I get it. Thanks! SanjaykumarMonu (talk) 12:57, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]