User talk:RaphaelQS/Archives

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The New England Journal of Medicine.svg

Thank you for uploading File:The New England Journal of Medicine.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 04:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, low resolution doesn't mean low quality, please check: Wikipedia:Logos and this template:

This is a Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) image of a registered trademark or copyrighted logo. If non-free content restrictions apply, this image should not be rendered any larger than is required for the purposes of identification and/or critical commentary. See Wikipedia:Logos.

--RaphaelQS (talk) 05:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely one of these two formats' images is suitable and the other deletable (don't need both), but it does seem that the preference for/against vectorized logos changes periodically. I'll ping some folks who deal with this issue more often for their advice. Please add your thoughts at Wikipedia:Non-free content review#File:The New England Journal of Medicine.svg and File:Nejm logo2011.PNG. DMacks (talk) 13:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image sizes

I see you are changing a lot of infobox images to be 225px--some had been unspecified and others were specified at 200px or so. Why the change from "default for a template" and/or to be larger than template-docs recommend? DMacks (talk) 04:04, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, the default size (200px) is not the recommended size, it's the size which agrees with the largest number of images. Following the form of images (higher than wide, wider than high or simply square) a size adjustment is required. In most cases, the size of 225px. --RaphaelQS (talk) 05:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was starting from {{Infobox university}}, where image_name is documented as "Produces an image of 200px by default." So apparently there's consensus that that's at least the standard size, for whatever technical or aesthetic reason intended by the designers of the infobox. I guess I don't understand how suddenly 12.5% larger than that is the best way for "most cases". Even {{Infobox}}, the master template for all infobox types, uses 200px in all its examples. FWIW, among the user-preference image sizes for thumbs are 200px, 220px, and 250px, but not 225px, and with 220px the default. And that's for all images (including ones where there is actual encyclopediac content not just decorative image of a person or logo). I don't understand the "following the form" comment...are you trying to standardize the image height rather than width in the display? DMacks (talk) 09:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, maybe you're right after all, you're older than me on the English Wikipedia so I'll trust you. RaphaelQS (talk) 11:36, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hermann Rohrschach

Your edit restored the phrase "he did sessss was a very good man" which did not make sense to me, which is why I reverted to an earlier version of the article. Perhaps my reversion also kept some vandalism and an even earlier version needs to be restored to get a completely clean version. It did not seem that way but I may have missed something. Or perhaps a very careful review of the whole article must be made to remove all vandalism, although I think that is probably unnecessary. Donner60 (talk) 04:51, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did not participate in this article except to increase the size of the image in the infobox. --RaphaelQS (talk) 04:53, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrations for Aesop's Fables

I see you're new to WP and so probably aren't aware of the hidden dynamics among some of us editors. I've reverted your change of image at The Fox and the Grapes because it clashes with the illustration policy those of us who curate the fables of Aesop and La Fontaine have established between outselves. There's a discussion of that on the talk page of Aesop's Fables. When we first started, almost everyone used the Milo Winter prints. In the interests of diversity in a very rich field of alternative choices, I purged those down to only the most striking and substituted where possible pictures with more relevance to the text. The Fox and the Grapes had your Milo Winter print once, but a picture of a fox beneath a tree vine didn't really seem to fit and clearly was wide of what actually happens in the fable. I was made to change the picture I chose (as you'll see from the fable's talk page) and used instead a print from the original edition of La Fontaine's fables, since his version is discussed in the text and because it illustrates the fox actually trying to get at the grapes, which the other two illustrations don't. I thought I'd explain since, looking at the other messages, it seems you've worked out some kind of a policy in your head and are imposing it without consensus. Please give some of us other editors credit for the fact that we may have given our choices consideration first - and even discussed them with others. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 10:07, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry... --RaphaelQS (talk) 10:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yuval Harari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paris School of Economics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French universities. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:E-mart logo.svg

I uploaded your file to Commons. (see also: commons:Commons:Threshold of originality)--Namoroka (talk) 09:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Le Nouvel Observateur front page.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Le Nouvel Observateur front page.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:12, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Haier may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

revenue = {{profit}} CNY180.3 billion<br />{{profit}} USD29.5 billion) (2013)|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:53, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Company foundation

Can you please take care not to remove information, as I had to repair several articles following your edits? Thanks. Samsara 08:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! JohnInDC (talk) 19:38, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to infobox image sizes, unaccompanied by any explanation, seem rather random - some larger, some smaller; it would be quite helpful if you were to explain what you are doing as you are doing it. Thanks! JohnInDC (talk) 19:44, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here's how I make it:
Infobox company: 200px or smaller for the logo, 250px for image (example: Pentax)
Infobox university: 200px for the University Seal, 250px for the logo (example: Cornell University)
Infobox newspaper: 240px for the logo, 260px for the image (example: Neue Zürcher Zeitung)
--RaphaelQS (talk) 19:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. You might check around to see if there are any sorts of - accepted standards on those. And edit summaries are helpful in any case! Thanks - JohnInDC (talk) 21:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Really - please. Use edit summaries. When you don't, you just force other editors to guess - or research - what you're intending to do. They are helpful, and are an important part of a collegial editing atmosphere. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 13:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will do it, you're right. Thank you for taking the time to tell me this. RaphaelQS (talk) 15:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Busan Bank.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Busan Bank.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:32, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kyunghyang Shinmun logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kyunghyang Shinmun logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:57, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kyunghyang Shinmun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo liberation.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo liberation.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sungkyunkwan University seal.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sungkyunkwan University seal.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Roubaix may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[File:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:13, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seal Sciences Po.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Seal Sciences Po.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 07:22, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhodes College logo 2.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhodes College logo 2.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan 19:10, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]