User talk:Radhoo21221

Welcome!

Hello, Radhoo.tech, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:URADMonitor, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 17:51, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:URADMonitor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:URADMonitor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 17:51, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: URADMonitor (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:URADMonitor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:59, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Radhoo.tech! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:59, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Trying to see how I can improve it. My intention was not to promote, but to contribute factual, sourced information about a project I worked on that has been referenced in peer-reviewed academic journals and international environmental reports, like these here Google Scholar search for "uRADMonitor" . }} Radhoo.tech (talk) 08:35, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: URADMonitor (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still written entirely like an advertisement with no inline citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:URADMonitor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:16, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. $Salvio giuliano$ 20:43, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:Salvio giuliano. My intention was not to post more noise and promotions, but to contribute factual, sourced information about a project I worked on for the last 10 years that has been referenced in peer-reviewed academic journals and international environmental reports, like these here Google Scholar search for "uRADMonitor" . The uRADMonitor project is somewhat similar in scope and functions to this Safecast . My idea was to publish an article with a similar structure but it seems I failed so far, but willing to improve. Radhoo.tech (talk) 08:39, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 03:24, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Radhoo21221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

radhoo21221 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I I’m happy with any username, really. This was just my personal Gmail address used with this account, but any random username will do. I hope "random" doesn’t give the wrong impression. Other than that, I’m new to Wikipedia and it seems I’ve already run into trouble. I need to learn how to properly submit an article, and I see there’s a community that can help with that. Thanks!

Ping to @Jauerback: regarding the need for published sources , most of what I included are academic references. For example, a Google Scholar search for "uRADMonitor" shows several peer-reviewed papers. They are not few, and should count toward notability, I believe. This one Safecast is somewhat similar in scope and content to what I tried to publish, is it a good practice example?

I respectfully request reconsideration of the block and a second chance to contribute properly. Thanks.

Decline reason:

You need to address all four points raised above. You will not be unblocked to write about uRADMonitor. If this is your only goal, this is the end of the line. Yamla (talk) 10:16, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

Radhoo21221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

radhoo21221 (talk · account availability check · rename user)

Request reason:

Thank you for reviewing my request Yamla. I understand that writing about a topic I am closely associated with, even with good intentions, can compromise Wikipedia's neutrality policies. I acknowledge the concerns around my username and article tone, I'm happy to let others handle the uRADMonitor article instead. I would appreciate being unblocked to contribute neutrally on unrelated topics and learn from the community. Also as said, I am open to changing the username to anything compliant.

As presented to Yamla, my plan is to use the sandbox for any new article ideas or ask the community to address what I consider a useful addition to Wikipedia. As a new user it's obvious there are things I need to learn. I would be happy to have my account unblocked if possible. Thank you. Radhoo21221 (talk) 20:44, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=radhoo21221 | 3=

Thank you for reviewing my request Yamla. I understand that writing about a topic I am closely associated with, even with good intentions, can compromise Wikipedia's neutrality policies. I acknowledge the concerns around my username and article tone, I'm happy to let others handle the uRADMonitor article instead. I would appreciate being unblocked to contribute neutrally on unrelated topics and learn from the community. Also as said, I am open to changing the username to anything compliant. As presented to Yamla, my plan is to use the sandbox for any new article ideas or ask the community to address what I consider a useful addition to Wikipedia. As a new user it's obvious there are things I need to learn. I would be happy to have my account unblocked if possible. Thank you. Radhoo21221 (talk) 20:44, 23 July 2025 (UTC) | 4=~~~~}}[reply]

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=radhoo21221 | reason=

Thank you for reviewing my request Yamla. I understand that writing about a topic I am closely associated with, even with good intentions, can compromise Wikipedia's neutrality policies. I acknowledge the concerns around my username and article tone, I'm happy to let others handle the uRADMonitor article instead. I would appreciate being unblocked to contribute neutrally on unrelated topics and learn from the community. Also as said, I am open to changing the username to anything compliant. As presented to Yamla, my plan is to use the sandbox for any new article ideas or ask the community to address what I consider a useful addition to Wikipedia. As a new user it's obvious there are things I need to learn. I would be happy to have my account unblocked if possible. Thank you. Radhoo21221 (talk) 20:44, 23 July 2025 (UTC) | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from [[Wikipedia:Changing username]] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}[reply]

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=radhoo21221 | reason=

Thank you for reviewing my request Yamla. I understand that writing about a topic I am closely associated with, even with good intentions, can compromise Wikipedia's neutrality policies. I acknowledge the concerns around my username and article tone, I'm happy to let others handle the uRADMonitor article instead. I would appreciate being unblocked to contribute neutrally on unrelated topics and learn from the community. Also as said, I am open to changing the username to anything compliant. As presented to Yamla, my plan is to use the sandbox for any new article ideas or ask the community to address what I consider a useful addition to Wikipedia. As a new user it's obvious there are things I need to learn. I would be happy to have my account unblocked if possible. Thank you. Radhoo21221 (talk) 20:44, 23 July 2025 (UTC) | decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}[reply]

I merged your requests, as only a single request is needed at a time. 331dot (talk) 08:09, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Thanks. Radhoo21221 (talk) 08:14, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are saying that you will not edit the uRADMonitor article, what topics or articles will you edit instead? 331dot (talk) 08:10, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Help Improving Draft

Hi everyone, I'm new to editing Wikipedia and recently ran into some issues with a draft I submitted. I now think the tone may have been too promotional, and I want to make sure the article meets Wikipedia's standards for neutrality and notability.

The topic (Draft uRADMonitor) has been covered in peer-reviewed journals and used in university-led air quality research. I'm looking for help in rewriting the draft to be encyclopedic and fully based on reliable, independent sources.

If any experienced editors are willing to provide feedback or collaborate, I'd be very grateful.

Thanks in advance!

Renamed

I have renamed your account. Another uninvolved admin will review your unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 16:28, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I must say that I find it impressive how Wikipedia works, so many different people involved in so many aspects, working to keep everything together. Truly a colaborative construction. Radhoo21221 (talk) 16:48, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]