User talk:PieWriter
Add topicWelcome to Simple English Wikipedia
[change source]
|
Esteban McKeever (talk) 01:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you PieWriter (talk) 01:54, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
Vandalism warning
[change source]At User talk:~2025-31357-25, you gave increasing warnings to the user 3 times, once at 01:08 and twice at 01:10. The user did not edit after 01:07. You have a first level warning and then a final level warning within 2 minutes and without the user ever editing in between. Warnings should not escalate with no other edits. You give the initial warning, then if they continue, you increase it. CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:24, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I am new at this. Thanks for letting me know. :) PieWriter (talk) 00:25, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Happy 2026, PieWriter
[change source]Happy 2026, PieWriter! That you have a great day on 2026! Ludo Games-T (talk) 21:53, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Ludo Games-T Thanks, hope you also have a great year ahead. PieWriter (talk) 00:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Thank you
[change source]
--Julius 12345 (talk) 13:02, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks! PieWriter (talk) 00:32, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
February 2026
[change source]
Hello PieWriter. Thanks for checking new pages – it's a very important job! I'm just letting you know, however, that it isn't good to mark pages for deletion as having too little meaning (QD A1) and/or being fully empty (QD A2) right after they are started, as you did at Atmosphere of Titan. It's usually best to wait at least 10-15 minutes for more to be written if the page is very short; tagging these pages overly quickly might drive away well-meaning editors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), nonsensical pages (G1), pages that break copyright law (G12), complete vandalism (G3) and clear hoaxes (A6) should of course still be tagged and deleted right away. Thanks. Passengerpigeon (talk) 02:17, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Passengerpigeon You really think they are going to expand from “bbc”? PieWriter (talk) 02:17, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- It seems like an obvious troll. PieWriter (talk) 02:19, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, I've seen that happen a couple of times, though I can't remember if the original user decided to stop messing around or if someone else noticed that the article had been created with a joking comment and stepped in to turn it into a real stub. Passengerpigeon (talk) 02:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- If someone wants to improve it, then they should be able to remove the template, I wouldn’t object to that. PieWriter (talk) 02:22, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Or I would myself remove it if I notice it expanded. PieWriter (talk) 02:23, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- If someone wants to improve it, then they should be able to remove the template, I wouldn’t object to that. PieWriter (talk) 02:22, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, I've seen that happen a couple of times, though I can't remember if the original user decided to stop messing around or if someone else noticed that the article had been created with a joking comment and stepped in to turn it into a real stub. Passengerpigeon (talk) 02:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)