User talk:Notfunnymatthew

Concern regarding Draft:Sensei Carl

Hello, Notfunnymatthew. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sensei Carl, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sensei Carl

Hello, Notfunnymatthew. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sensei Carl".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Have A Word (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TipsyElephant was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Websites that generally are not independent and reliable secondary sources include: WP:YOUTUBE, WP:AMAZON, WP:TWITTER, WP:FACEBOOK, WP:INSTAGRAM, other WP:SOCIALMEDIA such as TikTok, most WP:BLOGS, and WP:SPS on websites like PodBean. Please remove any sources that are unfit for use on Wikipedia before resubmitting the draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Have A Word and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Have A Word, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TipsyElephant (talk) 17:14, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notfunnymatthew! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TipsyElephant (talk) 17:14, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Have A Word (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Problems highlighted by the previous reviewer still haven't been fixed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Have A Word and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Have A Word, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 21:33, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More information as to why this was rejected would be useful especially when Off Menu with Ed Gamble and James Acaster The Adam Buxton Podcast Richard Herring's interview podcasts all exist and are less notable. Due to the nature of the content some sources from social media are needed to give context. Notfunnymatthew (talk) 23:54, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Have A Word (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TipsyElephant were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I've removed the clearly unreliable, self-published, and/or promotional sources along with unsupported prose. I understand that not all prose requires a source, but most if not all of the unsupported prose was promotional or overly-detailed content written from a fan's perspective. If you would like to continue working on this draft you'll need to focus on finding WP:INDEPENDENT and WP:RELIABLE secondary sources that discuss the show in some depth. For instance, a review of the show on a website such as podcastreview.org, podcastmagazine.com, The A.V. Club, or Polygon (website). Keep in mind that WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS do not contribute to notability. The sources from Rhyl Journal and The Daily Post would be considered trivial mentions. As far as I can tell, the only reason this topic might be notable is because of the awards which contribute to notability per WP:WEBCRIT. However, I personally don not think the awards are enough without at least one or two sources (maybe if the award was an Emmy or Hugo award). I also think the article is clearly WP:PROMOTIONAL (especially before I trimmed the article).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Have A Word and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Have A Word, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TipsyElephant (talk) 20:19, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Have A Word

Hello, Notfunnymatthew. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Have A Word, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]