User talk:Nomadoho

This is Nomadoho's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Helium Network Token (blockchain) (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PunjabiEditor69 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Helium Network Token (blockchain) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 14:16, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nomadoho! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 14:16, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello, I'm Helpful Raccoon. An edit that you recently made to Syngnathia seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 04:15, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Sarmccord per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sarmccord. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 05:17, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nomadoho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Nomadoho (talk) 18:06, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a reason to unblock you. If you intend your below statement as your request, this is a checkuser block, meaning that it is supported by private technical evidence. If you are not a sock, you will need to provide a plausible explanation as to why technical evidence might suggest otherwise. Please also see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sarmccord. 331dot (talk) 19:00, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not a socketpuppet. Please help. I am not sure why this person blocked me. I emailed them as well and have not heard back.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Nomadoho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet and have no idea what technical evidence is being referred to. I would sincerely appreciate clarification because I genuinely do not understand why I was blocked. I have never edited under any other account and have always acted in good faith. I also reached out via email but have not received a response. From what I can tell you have blocked another individual for socketpuppet issues, and now I stand to be accused of this, when in fact I am not a socketpuppet. I am new to wikipedia. Is there an administrator available that I can speak with? Nomadoho (talk) 19:20, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I am not a sockpuppet and have no idea what technical evidence is being referred to. I would sincerely appreciate clarification because I genuinely do not understand why I was blocked. I have never edited under any other account and have always acted in good faith. I also reached out via email but have not received a response. From what I can tell you have blocked another individual for socketpuppet issues, and now I stand to be accused of this, when in fact I am not a socketpuppet. I am new to wikipedia. Is there an administrator available that I can speak with?
[[User:Nomadoho|Nomadoho]] ([[User talk:Nomadoho#top|talk]]) 19:20, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
 |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I am not a sockpuppet and have no idea what technical evidence is being referred to. I would sincerely appreciate clarification because I genuinely do not understand why I was blocked. I have never edited under any other account and have always acted in good faith. I also reached out via email but have not received a response. From what I can tell you have blocked another individual for socketpuppet issues, and now I stand to be accused of this, when in fact I am not a socketpuppet. I am new to wikipedia. Is there an administrator available that I can speak with?
[[User:Nomadoho|Nomadoho]] ([[User talk:Nomadoho#top|talk]]) 19:20, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
 |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I am not a sockpuppet and have no idea what technical evidence is being referred to. I would sincerely appreciate clarification because I genuinely do not understand why I was blocked. I have never edited under any other account and have always acted in good faith. I also reached out via email but have not received a response. From what I can tell you have blocked another individual for socketpuppet issues, and now I stand to be accused of this, when in fact I am not a socketpuppet. I am new to wikipedia. Is there an administrator available that I can speak with?
[[User:Nomadoho|Nomadoho]] ([[User talk:Nomadoho#top|talk]]) 19:20, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
 |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Fixed for proper display. Someone else will review it. Only a checkuser can authorize the removal of this block. 331dot (talk) 19:47, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]