Jump to content

User talk:Neshyys

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zehra Neşe Kavak (November 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Destinyokhiria were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Destinyokhiria 💬 06:30, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Neshyys! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Destinyokhiria 💬 06:30, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Zehra Neşe Kavak, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Felicia (talk) 20:37, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
This draft does not meet the criteria for CSD G11 (advertising). The subject is a notable academic, medical scientist, university professor, and former board member of an international scientific organization (WAAS – World Academy of Art and Science).
The draft already contains multiple independent, reliable secondary sources, including national newspapers with significant coverage (Hürriyet, Milliyet, Radikal, Sabah, DHA, Habertürk, Yeni Asır). These sources provide substantial, non-promotional biographical and academic information. Therefore, the content is not promotional and meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for academics (WP:NPROF).
I am actively improving and adjusting the tone to ensure full encyclopedic style. Speedy deletion is not appropriate in this case. The draft should remain for further improvement or be moved to standard AfC review.
Thank you. Neshyys (talk) 20:53, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello Neshyys! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Requesting help to move draft to mainspace, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:17, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]