User talk:Moinak.shaivya

Welcome

Hello, Moinak.shaivya, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 10:17, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is Moinak.shaivya's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moinak Dutta (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hatchens was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It seems the draft is written by the entity itself. -

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moinak Dutta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Moinak Dutta, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moinak.shaivya! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hatchens (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moinak Dutta (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moinak Dutta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Moinak Dutta, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:16, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moinak Dutta (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are all primary or PR

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moinak Dutta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Moinak Dutta, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:27, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Draft:Moinak Dutta, you may be blocked from editing. Kuru (talk) 03:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Priyanka Saha

Hello, Moinak.shaivya, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Kavyansh.Singh, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Priyanka Saha, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyanka Saha.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kavyansh.Singh}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:14, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Kavyansh.Singh

So kind of you to have taken your time out and raised your concern. I just wanted to clarify if news articles and google knowledge graphs are not considered as reliable or verifiable sources? If not, then if you could please shed some light on what are. I would really like to hear form you as I started editing recently after reading all the guidelines thoroughly time and time again. Since I am a human, it might be that I have misinterpreted some part. Please help me and guide me in the right direction.

Hoping for your kind response. Moinak.shaivya (talk) 13:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Moinak.shaivya – Thanks for asking.

Generally, news articles from established secondary news organizations are reliable. But, various local news organizations have no consensus on their reliability. That means, editors have to judge it on case-by-case basis. As for Google knowledge graphs and basic Google search, it is not reliable. For biographies of living people, we need to put some extra attention that every statement is cited to a reliable source. I see that the article "Priyanka Saha" has much uncited text, like birth date, entire "Career" section, etc. Moreover, I was not able to find any other sources. Uncited text, combined with lack of any further citations available made me believe that the topic is not notable per Wikipedia standards. I also see some neutral point of view (NPOV) concerns, like saying that she was from a humble Bengali family (emphasis mine). Also, you have marked the image of the subject as your "Own work". So, is there any chance that you personally know the subject of the article. If so, please read Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. If not, feel free to ignore this particular point.

So, very simply put, at AfD (Articles for Deletion), we determine whether the article is suitable for Wikipedia: it is notable enough. Unfortunately, the article, in its current state, does not. Thus, I had nominated it for deletion. I'll suggest you to work on more notable topics. Your contributions to the encyclopedia are very much appreciated! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:57, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh

Thank You for the detailed explanation. I would keep all the points in mind from next time on. One question though, if a page gets deleted, is it possible to remake the page after all the previous problems are dealt with?

Thank You once again. Moinak.shaivya (talk) 03:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The primary concern here is lack of notability, and no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. Practically, you can create a new article, but I would not recommend doing so. If the topic remains un-notable, it would be deleted again. Thanks for asking, though. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:48, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moinak Dutta moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Moinak Dutta, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:21, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969

Hello,

I greatly appreciate your attention. However, it would be great if you could help me with my understanding of some terms. For example, in the general notability guideline, it is stated that: "Reliable" means that sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media, and in any language. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability. Please tell me if, a verified artist's profile in Spotify, or on Youtube or Apple Music or a published book on Amazon Kindle platform along with an IMDB profile and a Google Knowledge panel not verifiable or reliable sources. If yes, then was there any problem with my linking or citation? If yes, then please guide me through the process. And if they are not verifiable sources, can you please give me some examples of verifiable and reliable sources so that I may not repeat the same mistake in future.

Please help.

Thank you

@Moinak.shaivya Moinak.shaivya (talk) 12:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Moinak Dutta

Hello, Moinak.shaivya. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moinak Dutta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Moinak Dutta

Hello, Moinak.shaivya. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moinak Dutta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:03, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]