User talk:KnowledgeCraft

Welcome!

Hello, Media Solutions Netwrok!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, TarnishedPath^talk 08:39, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TarnishedPath Thank you for the warm welcome and helpful guidance. I appreciate the resources you shared, especially the links to the tutorial and the Teahouse. I am still learning the finer points of style, sourcing, and policy, and I will make sure to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines as I continue contributing. If you ever notice anything I should improve in my edits, please feel free to let me know. I look forward to contributing constructively to the project...(: Media Solutions Netwrok (talk) 08:46, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One question, given your account name, are you here to edit on behalf of clients? TarnishedPath^talk 08:47, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TarnishedPath No dear.. Media Solutions Netwrok is just a professional-sounding username I use online, but it is not a company or PR service, and I am not doing paid promotion or paid editing on Wikipedia.

I edit here in a personal capacity only, and I am not representing any clients. If I ever have a conflict of interest in the future, I will disclose it and follow Wikipedia’s COI guidelines. Thank you for checking, and I appreciate your guidance...(: Media Solutions Netwrok (talk) 08:52, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Media Solutions Netwrok", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot Thank you for the message and for pointing this out. Media Solutions Netwrok is only a personal username I chose because it sounded professional, but it does not represent any company, group, or organisation. I am the only person using this account, and I am not doing any paid editing or promotional work on Wikipedia. If the username is still considered too close to an organisational name, I am happy to request a rename to avoid any issues. Please let me know if a rename is recommended, and I will follow the process through Special:GlobalRenameRequest. Thank you for your guidance.(: Media Solutions Netwrok (talk) 09:19, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest renaming to avoid any troubles. TarnishedPath^talk 09:21, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TarnishedPath sure i will do it right...(: Media Solutions Netwrok (talk) 09:22, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are several marketing companies in India with the name "media solutions" in their name; I'd change it if you are an individual. 331dot (talk) 09:25, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot I have submitted a request for a username change to comply with the policy. Thank you all for your help and support. Media Solutions Netwrok (talk) 09:26, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Media Solutions Netwrok If you get unblocked, you might consider that it's not really a "professional" sounding name since "network" is spelled wrong. Also, even if it is an individual name for you, it does sound very "marketing-like" and Wikipedia articles are explicitly not here for marketing purposes. The name might continually cause suspicion as to whether you are a paid marketing company. Hope this helps. David10244 (talk) 02:12, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

Yamla (talk) 16:34, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KnowledgeCraft (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting a reconsideration of this block. I genuinely do not understand why I was identified as a sockpuppet, and I would appreciate clarification about what activity triggered this conclusion. I am a single individual editor and I do not operate or coordinate with any other accounts.

If any of my edits resembled those of other users, it was coincidental and not intentional. I have no involvement with any blocked accounts, and I have never edited to evade policies or bans. My intention has only been to learn and contribute constructively to Wikipedia.

I am willing to follow all guidelines, including username policy, sourcing standards, and conduct expectations. If I made mistakes, they were due to inexperience, not bad faith. I respectfully request more information about the block and a chance to correct my approach so I can contribute productively. KnowledgeCraft (talk) 16:38, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:50, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

KnowledgeCraft (talk) 16:38, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

??

Response KnowledgeCraft (talk) 18:52, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]