User talk:Mathscircle

Welcome!

Hi Mathscircle! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 10:28, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some recent edits

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page and MOS:OL to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Pro-anti-air (talk) 05:15, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Avraham Haim Zagdun. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please read MOS:OVERLINK. CodeTalker (talk) 05:02, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Gaetano Tranchino, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Most of your edits continue to violate MOS:OVERLINK. You have also introduced many grammatical errors. Please do not try to fix grammatical errors if you are not fluent in english. CodeTalker (talk) 15:58, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly accept my sincere apologies. I will not repeat this mistake and will be more careful with my edits in the future. Mathscircle (talk) 12:07, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Gary Nabel, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Code Zero^talk 05:29, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Aleksander Michałowski, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 13:17, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas Buckner. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your edits are frequently wrong, with inaccurate edit summaries. Please stop. Greenman (talk) 19:09, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Why do many your recent edits in the last few days violate MOS:OVERLINK? One doesn't link months, the word school in the name of an unlinked school, years, numbers, everyday words, and pretty everything else you've linked recently. Can you please revert these? Thanks Nfitz (talk) 06:33, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mathscircle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To the Wikipedia Administrators,

Dear Wikipedia Team,

Kindly note that Since I'm in my learning phase in wikipedia, I was not fully aware of all the wikipedia rules and regulations due to which this error happened, Sincerely apologies for the same. Also ensuring this won't happen in future as I'll be contributing more in a very responsible manner by adhereing wikipedia guidelines. Hope you will consider this request and do the needful at the earliest.

I am writing to sincerely apologize for my recent actions on Wikipedia. I understand I did multiple links, which I now realize was a mistake and goes against Wikipedia's guidelines.

I made a silly mistake while editing, which I deeply regret. I am a new user and I'm still learning the proper way to contribute to the platform. I promise to be more careful in the future and to abide by all rules and regulations.

I humbly request that you unblock my account and give me another chance to contribute positively to the communityMathscircle (talk) 07:51, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You appear to have used an AI to draft this unblock request. We want to hear from you, not an AI. PhilKnight (talk) 15:31, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mathscircle (talk) 07:51, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AI generated unblock request. If it were me, I'd decline this unblock request on those grounds alone. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:08, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:50, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing mainspace articles for a period of indefinitely for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Hammersoft (talk) 14:07, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a collaborative project. We progress forward by working together, taking into account Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines and Wikipedia:Manual of Style. In your five months of editing here, you have not once responded to concerns raised here on your talk page. While you are not required to respond, continuing to edit in what appear to be problematic ways when people raise the issues is not acceptable. You were cautioned about violating MOS:OVERLINK three weeks ago, and chose to ignore that issue. Today, you were told there is a WP:AN/I issue involving you. If you'd read that, you would know it was about violating MOS:OVERLINK again. Despite that, you continue to edit in violation of MOS:OVERLINK. As a result, I have partially blocked you on this project from editing any mainspace articles until such time as you respond, agree to operate within the bounds of MOS:OVERLINK and in the future respond to people's concerns about your editing. You are free to edit areas other than mainspace articles, including responding at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Mathscircle_reported_by_User:Mvcg66b3r. If you have questions, let me know. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:07, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mathscircle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a young student who is new to editing on Wikipedia and am still learning the ropes. I was not fully aware of all the guidelines and policies, which led to my account being blocked.

I sincerely apologize for my mistakes and assure you that I have taken the time to review the rules and now understand them better. I am committed to following all Wikipedia guidelines and contributing constructively to the community.

I would be grateful if you would consider unblocking my account and giving me another chance to learn and contribute in a more responsible manner.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Mathscircle (talk) 05:42, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You appear to have used an AI to draft this unblock request. We want to hear from you, not an AI. PhilKnight (talk) 15:31, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To any administrator considering this unblock request; The above text in the unblock request was AI/LLM generated. I think doing such text an unblock demonstrates a lack of understanding of our principles. I would not unblock given this request. To Mathscircle; please, we want to hear from you, not from a bot. If we wanted to hear from a bot, we wouldn't need humans to review block requests, and there wouldn't be any problematic editors, such as you have been doing with overlinking. Please don't use AI/LLMs in this way. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:31, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Team,

Kindly note that Since I'm in my learning phase in wikipedia, I was not fully aware of all the wikipedia rules and regulations due to which this error happened, Sincerely apologies for the same. Also ensuring this won't happen in future as I'll be contributing more in a very responsible manner by adhereing wikipedia guidelines. Hope you will consider this request and do the needful at the earliest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathscircle (talk • contribs) 09:10, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]