User talk:Lord.devraj007

Welcome!

Hi Lord.devraj007! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! SKAG123 (talk) 02:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Battle of Dewair (1606), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 12:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Annexation of Hyderabad, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. bojo | talk 17:18, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Battle of Dewair (1606), you may be blocked from editing. SKAG123 (talk) 02:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chandragupta Maurya. - Arjayay (talk) 14:29, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Battle of Dewair (1606), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 16:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Vima Kadphises. SKAG123 (talk) 01:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Lord.devraj007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Sanātana Dharma did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:03, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Kautilya3 (talk) 17:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chandragupta Maurya have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chandragupta Maurya was changed by Lord.devraj007 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855278 on 2023-09-10T10:41:54+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chandragupta Maurya. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 14:45, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Siege of Chittorgarh (1567–1568), you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kurukshetra War. SKAG123 (talk) 22:34, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Maurya Empire, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Chandragupta Maurya, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. How many times? Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 11:30, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Kalindi River (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:VERIFY.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Kalindi River and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 15:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lord.devraj007! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 15:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Srinagar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Srinagar. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and Article is just a mash of text, not ready for mainspace. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Seawolf35 (talk) 16:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RegentsPark (comment) 14:30, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly reverted edits, often on the same thing. I don't see any attempt to use article talk pages. RegentsPark (comment) 14:32, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Kalindi River

Hello, Lord.devraj007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Kalindi River, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Srinagar

Hello, Lord.devraj007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Srinagar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Kalindi River

Hello, Lord.devraj007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Kalindi River".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:50, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Srinagar

Hello, Lord.devraj007. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Srinagar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]