User talk:Lihaas/Archive 26
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Lihaas. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 |
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
Greetings,
It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.
Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
MfD nomination of User:Lihaas/IMU-Islam
User:Lihaas/IMU-Islam, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lihaas/IMU-Islam and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Lihaas/IMU-Islam during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dronebogus (talk) 06:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of War in popular culture for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
"Partition of Yugoslavia" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Partition of Yugoslavia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 2 § Partition of Yugoslavia until a consensus is reached. –Vipz (talk) 00:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:2016 Summer Olympics calendar
Template:2016 Summer Olympics calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of International reactions to the 2012 United States presidential election for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International reactions to the 2012 United States presidential election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Wow (talk) 06:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Azawad
Template:WikiProject Azawad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of ICL 20s World Series 2008–09 for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICL 20s World Series 2008–09 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 17:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
The article Akshay Nanavati has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article contains all the hallmarks of WP:UPE and promotional editing. The news sources are all reproducing the same text, and are from outlets known for unflagged paid news. The creator has been indeffed for violating the terms of use. The images are clearly ones put out by the subject himself. Even if this person is notable - and it looks borderline - we need to blow this up and start from scratch.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:10, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
The article JCall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
If this organization is notable, I am unable to find evidence of it; many links are broken, one is to a news piece that does not mention the subject, and my searches found nothing of substance. Creator indeffed for UPE.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
The article Ajay Nanavati has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Businessman who fails WP:GNG: sources are from press releases, on linkedin, or in one case, is an interview.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
The article Stor-Age has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article relies too heavily on press releases and other non-independent sources. I do not see evidence of the subject meeting WP:NCORP. Creator was indeffed for UPE.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Stor-Age for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stor-Age until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.