User talk:Lfstevens/2024 Archive
Questions: 57 Dabs: 11
Extant tags at "Moral economy"
[edit]Hello. You seem to have been doing a fair bit of copy editing at Moral economy. You've removed the main "Repetition" template, but three inline templates still exist and the article still shows at Category:Wikipedia articles needing copy edit from March 2022. If you're done, then they should go. Dhtwiki (talk) 09:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing. I have not completed the first pass. Another will be required to fix the organization. It's a process. On it. Lfstevens (talk) 19:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- I now see that the category has been emptied. That takes care of all the small-number months I had to add up when updating the drive progress table. So, thank you (and whoever else took care of those pages). Dhtwiki (talk) 06:50, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
)
Refill 2 on Pan-European Corridor VII
[edit]Hi @Lfstevens: thanks for using refill on Peace negotiations in the Russian invasion of Ukraine. I'm not sure how to use the tool. When I use use it on Pan-European Corridor VII, it seems not to detect any faults. Can you help me please? Stickhandler (talk) 01:49, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Refill2 cannot process pdf files. The other failed ref is to a dead site. Lfstevens (talk) 05:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. :) Stickhandler (talk) 18:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Catholic Church and slavery
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Catholic Church and slavery, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:48, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Self-driving Cars
[edit]Hi @Lfstevens, I've seen that you've made past edits to the Self-driving car page and would like to suggest a change to the definitions section of the page. Note - I'm employee of Mobileye and have declared my COI.
As mentioned in the "Criticism of SAE" section, the SAE levels are too focused on technologies and are not easily understood for the end consumer. We are now seeing the terminology of hands-on/eyes-off being used across the industry by automakers and news websites, replacing these SAE levels.
Here are some examples: Site Maintenance https://www.ford.com/technology/bluecruise/ Level 2 of autonomous driving Mercedes first to sell vehicles in California with hands-free, eyes-off automated driving Hands-off with the first true hands-free car in the US, and it's not Tesla | Electrek
The source of the this new taxonomy is Mobileye CEO Amnon Shashua: Mobileye CEO seeks alternative to SAE autonomy levels | Automotive News Original article: Defining a New Taxonomy for Consumer Autonomous Vehicles | Mobileye Opinion
If this is acceptable, I'd be happy to propose updated content for the new taxonomy. If not, I would love to hear your thoughts. Gideon at Mobileye (talk) 14:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- I would be happy to look at this, but am booked until 2/1. The content should come from me. Please feel free to point good sources out. Lfstevens (talk) 03:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Sure, these are the best sources:
- Mobileye CEO seeks alternative to SAE autonomy levels | Automotive News
- Mobileye Proposes New Taxonomy and Requirements for Consumer Autonomous Vehicles to Ensure Clarity, Safety, and Scalability
- The other sources I provided in my first comment can help provide a little more context around the topic. Gideon at Mobileye (talk) 08:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Started on this. Lfstevens (talk) 04:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Shrank the article by ~25%, getting rid of lots of obsolete stuff and general cruft
- Updated/expanded a few things.
- I have a draft of some text, but I haven't figured out where it goes. Hmmm.
- Also, I don't understand this paragraph in the original proposal:
The result of our requirement for no reproducible errors is that the system ODD should be much larger than the customer ODD. In other words, it is possible to limit the ODD to the customer to not allow lane changes in a regular mode of operations, but still, the system needs to be able to change lanes in an emergency maneuver.
Is it saying that the customer would not be able to change lanes manually, or that the system would not change lanes except in an emergency? @Gideon at Mobileye:
- Thanks. It means that the system would only change lanes in an emergency.
- The system must have the ability to change lanes for these emergency scenarios, regardless of whether changing lanes is a feature that the customer has access to. Gideon at Mobileye (talk) 14:48, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- So the customer cannot request a lane change (with the turn signal stick)? Or is it that the system would change lanes on its own only in an emergency? Sorry to be so dense. @Gideon at Mobileye: Lfstevens (talk) 18:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- The system would change lanes on its own in an emergency. Gideon at Mobileye (talk) 18:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- So the customer cannot request a lane change (with the turn signal stick)? Or is it that the system would change lanes on its own only in an emergency? Sorry to be so dense. @Gideon at Mobileye: Lfstevens (talk) 18:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's in there. Feedback encouraged! Lfstevens (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding @Lfstevens. I have a few comments:
- 1) Having all the ADS definitions in addition to the classifications is still quite confusing. The ADAS industry is expanding to include more autonomous capabilities which will ultimately end with a self-driving car. It started with automatic emergency breaking, lane keeping assist and has evolved from there to include more scenarios and features with more autonomy like navigate-on-pilot. ADAS is a spectrum which on one end has base features as listed here Advanced driver-assistance system and on the other hand is full self-driving.
- I would suggest rewriting these definitions to make it clear. Let me know if you would like me to provide a first draft.
- 2) I would remove the paragraph about Operation Driving Domain from the Mobileye section or move it earlier on the page. ODD is an important topic to explain but it isn't specific to Mobileye's taxonomy - it also works with the SAE levels and all other definitions provided above. Often the differences between all the ADS definitions on the page can be understood by looking at autonomous driving in different ODDs.
- 3) The criticism of the SAE level paragraph is still under the Mobileye taxonomy. I would suggest moving to the end of the SAE classification section.
- 4) To help readers visualize the taxonomy, I would add the image from the blog: [1] Gideon at Mobileye (talk) 09:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Is the image in the public domain? Otherwise it's a nogo for WP. Lfstevens (talk) 18:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- 1 Are you recommending dropping the high-level defs (except for SAE) in favor of describing individual features?
- 2 ODD - switched to an excerpt from Operational design domain. Edited that article accordingly.
- 3 Done
- 4 Public domain? Lfstevens (talk) 20:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- 1) Not quite. I recommend keeping both classifications and leaving the individual features for the ADAS page (which is done really well).
- Instead I would write a short paragraph about how ADAS is transitioning into self-driving. The paragraph 'Delivering higher levels of automation' in this McKinsey report is very helpful: The future of autonomous vehicles (AV) | McKinsey
- 2) This is great, although probably more relevant in the Technology section
- 3) Awesome
- 4) English: Mobileye taxonomy that explains the definitions of autonomous driving technology using the terms hands-on/off, eyes-on/off and no driver. Gideon at Mobileye (talk) 13:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks @Lfstevens for making the changes.
- Something else that could add value to the page is some information about the leading companies in the field that could be placed at the end of the History section.
- Guidehouse has a report with a leaderboard of the top Automated Driving Systems companies and ABI Research also has a report about the top Autonomous Vehicle Companies
- Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard: Automated Driving Systems Top 5 Autonomous Vehicle Companies We Recently Studied Gideon at Mobileye (talk) 18:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Will take a look. Lfstevens (talk) 22:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Is the image in the public domain? Otherwise it's a nogo for WP. Lfstevens (talk) 18:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Morpho (UAV)
[edit] Hello, Lfstevens. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Morpho (UAV), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reminder. Updated. Lfstevens (talk) 02:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Self-driving car
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Self-driving car, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to join New pages patrol
[edit]
Hello Lfstevens!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Russo-Ukrainian war
[edit]Hello, i noticed you are active in the page, if you can kindly check the last post on the talk page about an edit request. Best regards. Mariusx12 (talk) 15:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors 2023 Annual Report
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors 2023 Annual Report
Our 2023 Annual Report is now ready for review.
Highlights:
– Your Guild coordinators:
Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Wracking.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|

The article Essive-formal case has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
One reference citing one theorist makes this original research. Formal case has also been proposed for deletion.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 17:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
[edit]![]() | |
Six years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! Lfstevens (talk) 19:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Wave Power § Out of phase buoy - CorPower
[edit]Hi @Lfstevens, I saw your addition to the wave power page and I had a couple of comments/questions, as separately I've created a page for the company at CorPower Ocean.
Do you have a source for the claim of "300% increase (600 kW) in power generation"? Also, does this source refer to the device as an "Out of phase buoy", as this is not a term I've heard – my understanding is the CorPower technology uses a negative spring to amplify the motion.
Cheers, Drnoble (talk) 08:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing. I just added the source in the piece. Shame on me for forgetting to do so the first time around. Lfstevens (talk) 18:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Instagram face for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instagram face until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.With Love from Cassie Schebel (talk) 01:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
CopyEdit
[edit]Hi @Lfstevens, I'm Peng, new to Wikipedia but eager to learn. I've become familiar with Wikipedia guidelines, but a DYK (Did You Know) reviewer recently suggested that my article needs some copyediting. I've made as many improvements as I could, but I'm not sure if it's enough. This is my first time facing a copyediting issue, so I turned to the CopyEdit Project page and found you. Could you kindly assist me in performing copyediting work on my article Taiyin Xingjun? I'm also keen to learn more about what copyediting entails on Wikipedia, and I'm eager to learn from you. Thank you! TheGreatPeng (talk) 10:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not available at the moment. I suggest adding the {{copyedit}} tag to your article. One of our dedicated copyeditors will be glad to help you, although there is a considerable backlog of requests. Good luck and welcome to Wikipedia! Lfstevens (talk) 20:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on High-speed rail
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page High-speed rail, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Strategic Defense Initiative
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Strategic Defense Initiative, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:30, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Strategic Defense Initiative
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Strategic Defense Initiative, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:49, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Hanseatic League
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hanseatic League, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Hanseatic League
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hanseatic League, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Reminder: GA backlog drive
[edit]Hello! Just a reminder that, if you have time, you are welcome to join the GA backlog drive; it runs until the end of July. You are receiving this message because you signed up on the drive page but have not yet listed any reviews. We hope to see you there! Either way, happy editing! —Ganesha811 (talk) 05:09, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Please don't add unsourced paragraphs
[edit]For instance in Superlubricity you added one about the extent of frictional losses. While true, an unpublished paper is not citable on WP, so the claim should be removed, or edited to use Erdimir's work. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing. Forgot to add the cite. Fixed. Lfstevens (talk) 16:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hmmm. The source you mentioned was a news report that quoted a paper which in turn quoted another paper....all the way back to the original Eridemir work. In tribology the original work is the normal source, so I changed it. Furthermore I think it goes better in the applications rather than a slightly disjointed paragraph.
- N.B., the page needs some work. I have not been involved in them, but I know of the "debates" about the topic (being polite) that should be included. For certain the core Aubry transition needs to be included -- which itself needs a page. Not enough hours... Ldm1954 (talk) 18:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help. Agree on the need for more effort here. I doubt that I'll get to it.... Lfstevens (talk) 18:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
July 2024
[edit] Your edit to Superlubricity has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
GDMG page
[edit]Hi Lfstevens. I work for GoDigital Media Group. I disclosed my COI and requested a corrected/updated list of subsidiaries a few weeks ago and haven't gotten a response. I saw that you were the biggest contributor to the digital rights management page and was hoping you might be willing to take a look. You can find my edit request '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:GoDigital_Media_Group# here]'''.
Let me know if you are willing to take a look.
Best regards,
Matthew Matthewjmt (talk) 23:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not available at the moment. Suggest you add this request to here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests Lfstevens (talk) 01:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikiproject
[edit]Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Philippine mythology, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 20:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing. Not available ATM. Good luck. Lfstevens (talk) 23:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Hello Freakbob6969 (talk) 00:09, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. Lfstevens (talk) 07:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Mobileye
[edit]Hi @Lfstevens, thank you again for your assistance in editing the Mobileye page back in February. I had a few more suggested additions to the Mobileye page that I would be happy if you could take a look at.
The first is about the Partnerships section, which today exists only of Tesla and Porsche and doesn't talk about the biggest partnership we have - with the Volkswagen Group. I drafted some text for you to look at, if that's okay.
I also have a few industry awards that Mobileye has won recently that could be added into a new section. Please let me know how you would like to proceed.
Thanks! Gideon at Mobileye (talk) 07:03, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Gideon at Mobileye. I'd like to help, but I'm not going to have much time for a bit. Lfstevens (talk) 00:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay sure. Would it be helpful if I provide you with the full text for you just to review? Gideon at Mobileye (talk) 06:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- As you like. Lfstevens (talk) 19:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks @Lfstevens. Here are the main company awards from the last few years with sources. Thanks again for your time.
- 2024
- Company Awards:
- Volkswagen Group Award for digitalization
- 2024 Frost and Sullivan Enabling Technology Leadership Award – Mobileye awarded in the global passenger vehicle ADAS industry, for excellence in best practices.
- 2023
- Company Awards:
- LEED Platinum® rating from the U.S. Green Building Council
- Guidehouse Insights Leaderboard: Automated Driving System – Mobileye ranked as #1
- The inaugural ABI Research Autonomous Vehicle Platforms – Mobileye awarded with the top score
- Informa Automotive Tech Company of the Year
- [2] World's Most Trustworthy Companies 2023 - Mobileye ranked as #2 in Vehicles & Components industry.
- Executive Awards:
- MotorTrend Software-Defined Vehicle Innovator Award: Pioneer Winner – Amnon Shashua
- Automotive News All-Star -- Amnon Shashua
- Israel Prize for Lifetime Achievement -- Amnon Shashua
- 2022
- Executive Awards:
- The Automotive Hall of Fame Mobility Innovation Award - Amnon Shashua
- 2021
- Executive Awards:
- Automotive News Automated Driving Exec of the Year – Amnon Shashua
- Business Insider AV Power Player -- Gaby Hayon Gideon at Mobileye (talk) 07:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Lfstevens, I know you're pretty busy but I just wanted to check in about my last message. Do you foresee any issues with the information above? If not, I'd like to go ahead and add it to the page if that's okay Gideon at Mobileye (talk) 07:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- As you like. Lfstevens (talk) 19:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay sure. Would it be helpful if I provide you with the full text for you just to review? Gideon at Mobileye (talk) 06:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Micro-compounding
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Micro-compounding, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Concentrated solar power
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Concentrated solar power, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:36, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Don Hertzfeldt page
[edit]Hi Lfstevens,
Rather than get into an edit war, I'd like to discuss why you've made such sweeping changes to this page.
In my opinion, this new layout is a bit of a mess and not an improvement. Your edits, such as to this sentence, "...best known for the animated films It's Such a Beautiful Day, the World of Tomorrow series, ME, and Rejected, and his latest short film ME," also don't really make any sense.
If there is something specific about the way the page had been formatted that bothered you, I'd be happy to discuss and find a compromise. Ang-pdx (talk) 06:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- I came upon this page only because it was tagged for copyedit. I have no knowledge/opinion about the subject. I'm happy to fix any errors that I introduced. Please lmk of anything I messed up. Lfstevens (talk) 04:39, 15 November 2024 (UTC)