Jump to content

User talk:Kwametalks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phrimpong (July 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Wikipedia can't source itself. YouTube/iTunes aren't reliable. What's left isn't sufficient to show Notability. You also need to declare your conflict of interest.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KJP1 (talk) 06:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kwametalks! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KJP1 (talk) 06:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

[edit]

Hi. I've blanked the biography on your user page. Please note that Wikipedia is not a blog or free web hosting service. See WP:UPNOT for details. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your off-line question, the material is still there. Just click on the "View History" tab at the top of the page, and you can see all the previous versions. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phrimpong (July 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Strip away the sources that are not reliable, and the draft is left with only one independent source about Phrimpong, https://ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/entertainment/Phrimpong-to-change-the-face-of-GH-rap-with-School-album-416430. He is described as a "promising" musician, whereas Wikipedia articles should be about topics that have already gained significant attention from the world at large. He does not appear to be a suitable topic for an encyclopedia article at this time. Wikipedia is not for marketing, promotion, or public relations.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Worldbruce (talk) 14:37, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phrimpong (October 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Frayae were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 19:55, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Phrimpong

[edit]

Hello, Kwametalks. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Phrimpong".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 09:08, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]