User talk:Kaletheshadow
Add topicAugust 2009
[change source]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make useful changes to Wikipedia. However, at least one of your changes, such as the one you made to "Caesar cipher", did not appear to be useful and has been automatically reverted by GoblinBot4. If you want to try out changing Wikipedia to learn more about how it works, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Bad warning? Please report it here then remove this warning. --GoblinBot4 (talk) 01:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Please do not make changes to Wikipedia, as you did to "Tool", that are not useful. The changes you made seem to be vandalism and have been automatically reverted by GoblinBot4. If you want to try changing Wikipedia to learn more about how it works, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Bad warning? Please report it here then remove this warning. --GoblinBot4 (talk) 01:22, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:Bluegoblin7. If you continue, you will be blocked from changing Wikipedia. Thank you.
Bad warning? Please report it here then remove this warning. --GoblinBot4 (talk) 01:26, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will get for your disruptive comments.
If you keep making personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:Kaletheshadow, you will be blocked for disruption. Talk about the changes editors have made, not the editors. --GoblinBot4 (talk) 01:30, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Chenzw Talk 01:34, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Kaletheshadow (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)
Request reason:
I'm done with the spam. I'll make constructive edits, I have done so on English Wikipedia by correcting some grammar on a disambiguate page. I won't do anymore reckless or inane edits with any random or inappropriate content. I beg of you, For this shared household, Unblock me.
Decline reason:
Your vandalism and personal attacks have continued in spite of the warnings you have received. In addition, your vandalism started after your constructive edits to the English Wikipedia, suggesting that you do have any intention of contributing constructively over here. -- Chenzw Talk 02:16, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Kaletheshadow (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)
Request reason:
I very much realize the weight of my actions here, I realize that I shouldn't be forgive for such action, But I appeal to you. Please, I would really like a chance to prove myself here. I know my actions were very inappropriate and that it was stupid to vandalize as I did. I'm sorry for doing this and I really would appreciate some mercy. Maybe giving me a time limited ban, Say, Three months instead of perma-banning me. Just want another chance.. Please.
Decline reason:
Your edits were very silly. You showed that you don't understand the wiki princip. Someone who want to help, stop vandalism before blocking. This wiki isn't a test wiki, like let me see how often I can vandalize before I will be blocked. Your behaviour is clearly not appropriate. You vandalized also enwiki. I am pretty sure, that you will not stop doing these kinds of edits. In short: Unblock request declined.
--Barras || talk 16:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note: Unblock requests received via email. Chenzw Talk 02:16, 6 August 2009 (UTC)