User talk:Jayanthkumar123

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

June 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (RRR and Gaddar Telangana Film Awards) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 15:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Please stop moving pages such as Mangalore tile and Mangalore Special Economic Zone. These are proper nouns and their title is not subject to what we title the city article. See Bombay mix Bombay (cat) for just a few examples of this. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:52, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Highest grossing films order

Is highest grossing films order based on upper limit? Epicion (talk) 04:57, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since a long time the edits are made based upon upper limit, although there is no particular guideline. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 14:04, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some list including List of highest-grossing Tamil films, List of Indian films of 2025 is based on lower limit. Epicion (talk) 05:11, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody might have changed that later. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:46, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tamil film gross article already has upper limit based ranking. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 06:48, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vidaamuyarchi and Retro is not listed at Tamil film gross article. Epicion (talk) 11:17, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retro is box-office failure, no way it can gross 250 crore, Vidaamuyarchi on the other hand has some chance of grossing 250 crore. Seems like Dina Thanthi is inflating the box office figures, beacuase the upper limit figure for many films is from Dina Thanthi. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 12:43, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm NDG. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NDG (talk) 08:53, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello, I'm Aadirulez8. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Swasika, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aadirulez8 (talk) 18:14, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]