User talk:Jambutty12

February 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dominic Raab have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dominic Raab was changed by Jambutty12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954805 on 2022-02-01T14:27:26+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:27, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dominic Raab. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 14:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dominic Raab, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 16:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Hi Jambutty12! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Dominic Raab several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Dominic Raab, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 15:45, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 15:50, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 16:05, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Jambutty12_reported_by_User:Spy-cicle_(Result:_) for the specific section. Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 16:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:32, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]