User talk:Intragna

This is Intragna's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Conrad U. Brunner (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of this draft is completely unsourced. All of your references are in 1 section.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Conrad U. Brunner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf thank you. Helpful.

I added about a dozen more sources. I realize that sources in German or French Wiki are not readily available in English Wiki.

I hope that the sourcing is now ok for your standards. Many sources in this are about buildings. I only have copyright free pictures from two. Intragna (talk) 20:57, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sources don't necessarily have to be in English. It makes it easier for people here if they're English but that's not a requirement. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 02:32, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

how can I speed up the review process? Intragna (talk) 08:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Intragna! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Conrad U. Brunner (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Raydann was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add sources to the sections and/or remove them altogether.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Conrad U. Brunner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 09:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. I will work on it. BR Intragna Intragna (talk) 08:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Conrad U. Brunner (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EmeraldRange was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

First 2 sections are all missing WP:INLINE citations

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Conrad U. Brunner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 12:30, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Conrad U. Brunner

Hello, Intragna. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Conrad U. Brunner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. I edited first 2 sections. Good now Intragna (talk) 13:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Conrad U. Brunner (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Conrad U. Brunner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:31, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Conrad U. Brunner

Hello, Intragna. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Conrad U. Brunner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:43, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Dear Liz, since my first draft already about 3 years ago i tried to follow the advice of every Wikipedia adviser: to introduce more references for people, text and images, to shorten the overall text, to cut parts that cannot be referenced by independent sources, etc.

Now, I feel like geometer K in Kafka's novel "the castle", totally frustrated by the contradicting comments and non conclusive advice and the seemingly non-responsive evaluation of my sequential updates from your side.

From the outside, the selection criteria are not transparent, arbitrary if I compare other Wikipedia articles. Presumably you want to throw my draft out without a clear critique.

Regards

Conrad (Intragna) Intragna (talk) 18:12, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]