User talk:Inherme

February 2025

Hello, I'm Adamstom.97. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please don't add made up release dates to articles, even if they are drafts. - adamstom97 (talk) 17:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2027 NHL Winter Classic (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bobby Cohn were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2027 NHL Winter Classic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:48, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inherme! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:48, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2001:569:5161:2700:B932:DC0C:C427:103A (talk) 03:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits contain made-up information

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. In particular, you inserted made-up scores of sports matches that had not started at the time of your edit. In addition, you provided information on several upcoming movies without proof that they exist. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. On Wikipedia, all article changes that are not supported by cited references or sources will be removed. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. 2001:569:5161:2700:B932:DC0C:C427:103A (talk) 08:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 09:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]