User talk:HumanWritesBook

Welcome!

Hello, HumanWritesBook, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is great. thank you. HumanWritesBook (talk) 18:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Onorem (talk) 21:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! HumanWritesBook, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is great! Thank you @Liz HumanWritesBook (talk) 03:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bing Worthington has been accepted

Bing Worthington, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheChineseGroundnut (talk) 09:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Message received and noted with gratitude. It is an honor and privilege to be here in service to contribute the rightful, detailed documentation of relevant facts for proper preservation. Sincerely, with gratitude HumanWritesBook (talk) 19:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bing Worthington

Hi HumanWritesBook. Thanks for expanding Bing Worthington. I reverted a few of your additions today. I'm happy to elaborate on the reasons for the reverts if I was unclear. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 21:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Robby.is.on thank you for the memo. Please do elaborate...HumanWritesBook (talk) 03:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Robby.is.on

Bing Worthington HumanWritesBook (talk) 03:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do elaborate... Sure, I will. Please tell me which of my reverts are unclear and why. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:21, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

Hello, thanks for your thank you but just letting you know that the newest messages on any noticeboard or talk page are placed at the bottom of the page. If you put them at the top or in the middle of the page, the editor is not likely to see them. You can see this on your own User talk page as I've placed this message at the bottom of the page. It's where editors naturally look for new messages.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bing Worthington, Jr.

Hello, HumanWritesBook. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bing Worthington, Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bing Worthington 2

Hello, HumanWritesBook. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bing Worthington 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Hardy (attorney) has been accepted

Michael Hardy (attorney), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C F A 💬 03:38, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is an honor to work with you! HumanWritesBook (talk) 04:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bing Worthington, Jr.

Hello, HumanWritesBook. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bing Worthington".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ivan Berry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Complex and Dream Warriors. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Get Loose Crew errors

Your recent additions at Get Loose Crew require quite a bit of cleanup, including random bold font and nonsense phrases such as "The group is came to rise became". I'm working on sixing these errors now.

Please take more time with your edits, and please review the Manual of Style. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 15:36, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 15:36, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Similar issues at Beat Factory, such as inappropriate bold and italic text, and the nonsense phrase "based in It was an Ivan Berry and songwriter Rupert Gayle." Because you also added sources and made some improvements, I am fixing your edits rather than reverting them, but honestly this wording is so scrambled that it's borderline vandalism. Jessicapierce (talk) 15:57, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Beat Factory

Hello, I can absolutely see that you are acting in good faith to improve the Beat Factory article. However, your recent additions contained many errors, so I've removed it until those can be addressed. Your work has not been deleted - you can access it in the page history.

I would advise you to repost the content in your sandbox, where you can work on it until it is ready to resubmit. There were many errors such as inappropriate bold text, lack of italics on album titles, and mismatch of verb tense throughout the timeline section. There were also incomplete sentences, unexplained external links, and incorrect capital letters.

Please review the Manual of Style, as linked several times above, before contributing again. I'm happy to work with you on this - I'm very glad to see you're adding legitimate content with sources - but you really do need to clean this up significantly. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 00:19, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Peace and Salutations of Gratitude! Hello Jessica, Thank you for your valuable time, your attention, your expertise and your careful thought in this regard. It is an honor and privilege to connect with you in this journalistic cause of documentation so as to benefit generations to come! So that, moving forward, we can learn and grow in better service, may i kindly ask that you please provde details of the "many errors" that you are mentioning? Also, once we get the wrikles ironed out here, pshould you require any assistance in updating any ohter articles, please do not hesiste to let me know... I AM HERE TO SERVE AND HELP. And, I am human, not a robot, so I make mistakes and hope to learn and grow! Thank you , I look forward to your reply! Sincerely, with Gratitide, Michele aka HumanWritesBook (talk) 00:32, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can view the page as it appeared after your last edit here.

I did include a list of errors above, but if you need more specific information, here is a start.

"Beat Factory" should appear in bold only once, at the very beginning of the article.
"Hip hop" should not be in capital letters if not part of something like an album title. It's a common noun and should be in lower case.
Incorrect comma after "including" in the opening paragraph.
A header ("A timeline of Beat Factory notables:") should not end in a colon.
You removed a significant amount of previous, sourced content from the article without explaining why. You also replaced prose with a list, which is generally discouraged. Most articles read better as plain prose.
More incorrect bold text and capital letters.
Timeline shifts from past to present tense.
Several entries in timeline are incomplete sentences, and several are completely unclear, such as "GroovEssentials. and Glenn Lewis"
Incorrect capitals and bold text on dates.
Timeline punctuation shifts from colon to comma - "1987:" vs. "1988,"
Unformatted external link in the text at 1987.
Album titles are not in italics; they should be.

I am sure there are more issues, but I hope you can see by this already-substantial list that you need to read the Manual of Style and get a feel for basic Wikipedia expectations, before contributing further. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 00:59, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Natasha Doyle-Merrick for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natasha Doyle-Merrick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Doyle-Merrick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]