User talk:Histoireknowledgeable

Welcome!

Hi Histoireknowledgeable! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Nishjan (talk) 09:33, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

I noticed that you have marked all your edits as minor. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia. It refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. _signed,Willondon (talk) 14:38, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for clarifying Histoireknowledgeable (talk) 18:12, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hi Histoireknowledgeable. All of your edits so far seem to involve inserting uncited or poorly-sourced claims promoting Pakistani or Pubjabi identity, sometimes even removing mentions of other ethnicities or nationalities that are supported by citations and replacing them with these claims (like this or this). Please familiarize yourself more carefully with Wikipedia's core content policies, especially Verifiability and Neutral point of view, and make an effort to respect these policies. If you feel something is wrong in the article but you're not sure how to proceed in accordance with these policies, please write a comment or question on the article's talk page so that other editors can help. Thanks, R Prazeres (talk) 18:33, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I'm not Pakistani or Punjabi to have bias, my edit of "Examples of the style are found mainly in modern-day Pakistan and North India, with much smaller traces in Bangladesh." is backed by two sources that clearly detail that Bangladesh does not have the same extent of Mughal Architecture as India or Pakistan. This is a fact and proven by my sources. Histoireknowledgeable (talk) 18:54, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mughal architecture. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 19:08, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are undoing my edits, I did not undo any edits. Stop blatantly lying. Histoireknowledgeable (talk) 19:31, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@R Prazeres Known to have deleted other's edits, brutally supressing creativity, gaslighting others into believing that they have caused an "edit war", clearly inspired by unwikipedia ways. Histoireknowledgeable (talk) 19:43, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When discussing edits, it really is best to stick to the edits and Wikipedia policies, guidelines, etc. Directly addressing the behaviour of other editors does not end well as a rule. _signed,Willondon (talk) 19:51, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Histoireknowledgeable. As Willondon said, please stop making personal attacks. Edits like this look very bad. I apologize if my reverts seem frustrating to you, but Wikipedia is a project where all edits are subject to review by other editors. Articles are changed through consensus; when new edits are not accepted, they must be discussed with other editors. If editors merely repeat the same edits over and over, then anyone can add anything to any article without ever resolving problems; that's what the edit-warring policy is about. I have explained the problems as directly as possible to you, given you recommendations, and invited you to discuss one of your changes at Talk:Mughal architecture. Please respond by following the spirit of collaboration and discussion. Feel free to request further help or clarification from me or other editors. R Prazeres (talk) 19:53, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to King Edward VI Five Ways School have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: King Edward VI Five Ways School was changed by Histoireknowledgeable (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958539 on 2025-04-26T19:59:37+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:59, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Always cite reliable sources

Hello, I'm Worldbruce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chicken tikka masala, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Most of what can be found on the web is self-published, no impartial reviewers have evaluated the accuracy or fairness of it before it is served up. It is safer to stick to the websites of mainstream newspapers, refereed electronic journals, and university, library, and government collections of data. --Worldbruce (talk) 07:30, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

who is u?? who r u to remove my edits. ur name is bruce ur white tf do u know about chicken tikka masala. Histoireknowledgeable (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Indusxdits

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Indusxdits, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 16:08, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

You were told what a "minor edit" is four days ago. Please read Help:Minor Edit, and stop marking edits as minor, when they are not. And stop adding misleading edit summaries with your edits, such as describing this edit [1] as "Spelling mistake". _signed,Willondon (talk) 16:09, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. R Prazeres (talk) 16:54, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:12, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]