Jump to content

User talk:GreenMeansGo/Archive 16

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

  • Featured content: Catching up
    Covering all of August. Pretty much.

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

  • Featured content: By your logic,
    The first issue to feature two poetry article

I have undertaken another one of my quixotic quests to make an article out of a concept so broad and vague that it just barely pulls together. Would you like to help thread this needle? BD2412 T 15:26, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Odd and interesting. I've got a deadline for offwiki publishing by tomorrow. But I'll look into it. GMGtalk 22:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Thanks. No deadlines here, of course! BD2412 T 00:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
This one is actually now finished and live (so much for no deadlines), but now I'm turning my attention to my oldest live draft in the social science field: Draft:House guest. BD2412 T 05:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
@BD2412: Working though the first one little by little. But oof. Just realized there's no article for "waving" in the communicative sense. Just the physics topic of waves. GMGtalk 11:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Wave (gesture)? BD2412 T 17:03, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Well that is a poor redirect. GMGtalk 17:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
I put in a move request to make Waving the title of the article on the gesture. BD2412 T 18:00, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you

for this. I still have no idea why I'm perceived as "involved" when I'm absolutely not. Glad to have external endorsement that I haven't lost my marbles. Star Mississippi 14:56, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

The thing seems fairly poorly handled. From handing out an indef while community discussion on an IBAN was ongoing, to pitching a fit because they're the one who get's to decide when a block "served it's purpose," to taking the entire thing off-wiki and telling folks not to worry about it.
It's definitely an approach I've taken before, because I'm a father with a six-year-old. But being a mop isn't being a parent, and nobody really get's to say "my house, my rules, go to your room." GMGtalk 17:05, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Hah! I'm not a parent, but can totally see how your comparison works as I just spent part of the week with a 5 and 7 year old.
I'm definitely befuddled but guessing I was the sacrificial lamb for some reason. Oh well. Thanks again Star Mississippi 17:43, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

WP:MOSSIS says "Do not make a section whose sole content is box-type templates."-- Toddy1 (talk) 13:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

@Toddy1: Uh...yeah. It's not a box. That's why we have bulleted inline templates for sister projects. Take a deep breath, drink some water, and go back and read the entirety of the guidance you're citing. GMGtalk 14:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
(Talk page watcher) I agree, the section edit was a good edit. No issue here. BD2412 T 21:28, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Creativerse video game logo 2017.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Creativerse video game logo 2017.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

Nomination of William Afton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Afton, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Afton (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

  • Traffic report: Cricket jumpscare
    Plus Kollywood, Killers of the Flower Moon, and ongoing war.

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

  • Comix: Bold comics for a new age
    "I think we ought to read only the kind of comics that wound or stab us. If the comic we're reading doesn't wake us up with a blow to the head, what are we reading for?" — Franz Kafka
  • Humour: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies
    This page in a nutshell: Whether or not someone has denied unsavory allegations — though such a denial may not merit being given equal weight in an article — a worthless shitpost should still be included.

Wham!


Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

For deleting the commons main page. :) Seawolf35 T--C 16:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

  • In the media: Consider the humble fork
    Forky on forky on forky, plus a strange donation scheme and other interesting bits of news.
  • Technology report: Dark mode is coming
    No more must Wikipedia always be a lightbulb in the dark — except metaphorically of course.
  • Crossword: when the crossword is sus
    The Signpost Crossword is a 2018 online multiplayer social deduction game that takes place in space-themed settings where players are colorful, armless cartoon astronauts.
  • BJAODN: Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
    Edit summary: "Only need this page for about 30 minutes to demonstrate to a friend how easy it is to create a Wikipedia page. Then it will be deleted."

RFA

Your comment at RFA made me look at the candidate's uploads. They suggest to me that (Redacted). Discretion being the better part of valor, and having already incurred plenty of wrath, I'll not raise the issue at RFA itself. Banks Irk (talk) 01:37, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Copyedits

As someone who has English as their second language, I want to thank you for your grammar fixes and copyedits to Skibidi Toilet! I hope the subject matter didn't cause physical pain for you. :) Ca talk to me! 13:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Not at all. No worries. After spending all night at a Christmas party (which for some reason is still a thing on the 30th), and one that had way too many crying children, it was nice to sit on the deck in silence for a spell and just do come copyediting. Feel free to reach out any time I can be of any help. GMGtalk 13:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year, GreenMeansGo!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

I just want to say, thank you friend, for giving me the support I needed when none was available. I'll never forget :) Jerium (talk) 22:51, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

  • News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
    Let the games begin! The 2024 WikiCup is off to a strong start. With copyright enforcement, AI training and freedom of expression, it's another typical week in the wiki-sphere!
  • WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
    What are the editorial processes behind covering some of the most politically polarizing and contentious topics on English Wikipedia?

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

  • Opinion: Until it happens to you
    A stream of consciousness about plagiarism on Wikipedia from the perspective of a user who directly witnessed it.
  • Comix: We've all got to start somewhere
    Writing a good subheading for a one-sentence joke is basically like writing an entire second joke so I'm not going to do it.

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

  • Comix: Strongly
    That's more than weakly!

"Getting into WP:TRIVIA territory"

I don't disagree with your removal of the content on Hazbin Hotel. I think the Mary Sue article is somewhat passable when it comes to this, but... when looking up "verbalase hazbin hotel" this morning, I couldn't come up with ANY other reliable sources. So, it should remain removed from that page (or anywhere else). Historyday01 (talk) 14:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

We don't normally compile online videos about a subject in prose. GMGtalk 17:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

Wikicookie for you!

Thank you for helping me improve Nontransporting EMS vehicle!

Personhumanperson (talk) 14:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

checkY GMGtalk 14:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I

Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:

  • Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
  • Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
  • Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
  • Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
  • Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
  • Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
  • Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
  • Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
  • Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
  • Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
  • Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
  • Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
  • Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
  • Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
  • Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
  • Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
  • Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.

To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Archdiocese of San Francisco COA.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Archdiocese of San Francisco COA.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

Thank you for improving my article

Far-right politics in Israel, I appreciate it very much Alon Alush (talk)

17:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

Sockmuppet is the account that wants to restrict new accounts.

Treating new accounts like sockmuppets damages wikipedia's credibility. OPENCodeCCCCCC (talk) 15:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Do you want to damage wikipedia's credibility by restricting new accounts with valid points?

Why are you treating me like a sock muppet even though I wrote the right thing? If your account is locked, the only option is to create a new one. OPENCodeCCCCCC (talk) 15:53, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Or just go do something that isn't Wikipedia. GMGtalk 16:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins

Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

Woobie?

Woobie??

Woobie?!?

Keerist on a crutch, what have you people done with my Army? Qwirkle (talk) 04:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

I'm not sure most people really appreciate that the more manly-man a profession is, the more gay it is. I assume it started out as a joke, that someone needed a security blanket. Now we literally refer to it as a woobie in official packing lists. See also ranger panties, which I'm really surprised is a red link. There are signs saying "no ranger panties" at the chow hall along with "no soiled PTs". But whatever. I wanna be in the trench with the ranger pantie guy. He's probably a competitive marksman or makes explosives for fun. GMGtalk 11:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Oh, yeah, there’s all that, but there’s also a real Silly Names Tradition in the Green Machine, along with a countervailing trend. I can still recall an old colonel whose lips would twist sneerward when he heard someone call an M-79 a blooper. Qwirkle (talk) 19:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Never touched one. We get the under-barrel thing. There's probably a stupid name for it too. GMGtalk 23:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

  • In the media: War and information in war and politics
    Advocacy organizations, a journalist, mycophobes, conservatives, leftists, photographers, and a disinformation task force imagine themselves in Wikipedia.

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

  • Obituary: JamesR
    Rest in peace.


“Tim Walz was NOT a commander! That must be removed immediately. Its false and untrue.”

Dunno about Command Sergeant Majors, but there certainly seem to be a lot of Command Private Majors coming out of the woodwork on that article. Illegitimi non carburundum. Qwirkle (talk) 05:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

PS. Notice just being “false” isn’t enough; they gotta null-and-void it. Qwirkle (talk) 05:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Yeah...folks who talk about the military but have never served tend to have a bad poker face. It's really in the involuntary things, like using terminology that is maybe technically correct in a very literal sense, but is just never something anyone in uniform would ever actually say. Like dude who complained about Walz not "completing the testing." There's a lot of testing involved. Drug tests, vision tests, HIV tests, hearing tests... but nobody would ever refer to the SM Academy as "the testing". GMGtalk 10:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Do you remember the old joke about the Sergeant Major test site? Qwirkle (talk) 17:35, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
? GMGtalk 18:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
One of the truly great shaggy dog stories; it can be expanded to fill a whole evening if desired. Qwirkle (talk) 21:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
By all means. GMGtalk 23:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

So, on an obscure part of Fort Fillintheblank, hidden by forest, and surrounded by triple standard concertina and the occasional toe popper, there is a single company's worth of quarters and motor pool where an engineer unit maintains a nearby grassy parade ground with fanatical fervor. At each side of the secret field are concrete curbing and gutters. Every fillinthetimeperiod, when it becomes obvious a few more Smadges are needed, prospects are sent TDY orders, and the engineers begin final preparations. A giant crane rail emerges from its hiding place, and slowly makes its way down the field, guided by the curbing. Hanging off it are soldiers armed with grass shears, comb rakes, potting soil and grass plugs perfecting the lawn without stepping on a single blade. When the job is done, the OIC flips a single cigarette butt into the field.

On the testing day, each prospect is sent down a trail to survey the area, and report his findings.

Some poor souls quickly return, and simply describe a grassy rectangular field. They will soon be passed over twice.

Some take their time, and qualify and quantify, giving dimensions, grass height and cultivar. If they are precise and accurate enough, they will be encouraged to apply for warrant officer.

But the true Ser'eant Major returns almost immediately up the trail at a trot, eyes blazing, and says "THAT FIELD IS ALL FUCKED UP!"

Qwirkle (talk) 05:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Reminds me of the apocryphal story that there was a private walking on the grass in a parade field. Sarnt Major sees him and predictably "Get the hell off my grass!"
From the distance "Do you know what my name is?"
"No."
He rips off his name tape "Fuck you Sergeant Major!" And books it in the other direction.
But anyway, it is legit kindof weird that we use civilian contractors for so daggum many things but we still somehow end up with boots doing lawn care. I get the argument from attention to detail, good order and discipline, cleanliness wins and loses wars. But that's not really the kind of "mowing the grass" that the Army is supposed to be good at. GMGtalk 11:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
I was in the other camp, I think relying on contractors to the degree we now do is a big problem. There are four sets of prices for everything, and only three good ones: 0ne for those who know how to do it, and can, one for those who know how, but can't, one for those who at least watch the market, and one for those stupid enough to take all their advice from the people selling things.
There isn't, thank God, a vibrant private market in making war to compare our costs with. Qwirkle (talk) 16:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
I wouldn't be so sure. Didn't Russia just have a thing with mercenaries? GMGtalk 18:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Joking aside, Wagner was one of the worst examples of privatization of gain and socialization of risks and costs in recent history, and that's a field with a lot of competition. Qwirkle (talk) 23:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
True — and I'm playing Devil's advocate a bit — if you've earned your CAB, you can make six figures pulling security for some...I dunno...trucking company in Syria or something. I know at least one guy who was probably going to drink himself to death and that was his way out. Get out of the States and have a weapon in your hand. Of course there's an entirely different issue there of the US subsidizing private...well...mercenaries...because nobody besides the government is going to pluck you out of high school and give you a quarter million dollars in training. These private contracts aren't exactly entry level positions. GMGtalk 10:59, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

This is a wider problem than many people realize. Everybody gets that new 2LT is often a net negative for a goodly biece of time, and that a guy starting basic training is not a useful military resource yet. The same is true, though, for most other professions, and the initial career of an engineer, say, was often in the murky overlap areas with the blue collar side of the profession. You got hired on into a vasty bullpen of a hundred desks, and did some drafting and site survey and eased your way into the realities of the job. For that initial period, though, you were a net liabilty to the company.

The bullpen is gone now; most of the introductory overlap is replaced directly by computers in most AE firms. I am not sure this is always progress. Qwirkle (talk) 18:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

I don't think I saw this reply, but yes. I grow tired of getting a 2LT who hasn't been to basic, hasn't been to BOLC, but it's our fault if they get a negative comment on their OER. I'm not even an especially good Soldier and I have no idea really how I made rank.
I remember as a young SPC driving an LMTV lost in the baaaaack woods of Knox with a 2LT and having to turn around. "Sir, I need you to ground guide me so I can back up." We're totally alone and in the dark. Dude looked at me like I was speaking a foreign language. If I was king of the Army I would do lot's of things, but the first would be to mandate that you have to at least make E4 promotable before you can commission. Sir, I appreciate that you have commendable power-point-fu and great cardio, but that doesn't apply to a lot of situations. GMGtalk 13:16, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
The change in ossifer training from back in my day appears to be pretty dramatic. There were examples of direct commissioning then that escaped immediate formal training in the basics of soldiering, but they were in the rare specialized MOSes, not in combat arms or combat support.
Getting away from that does not strike me as a change for the better. Qwirkle (talk) 11:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
I remember being on active for the 1980s government shutdowns, and watching how much chaos even a short interruption could cause. Hope you and yours are doing OK with the current CF. Qwirkle (talk) 01:07, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

  • In focus: Twitter marks the spot
    Musk's Twitter acquisition and rebranding have caused long debates on Wikipedia.

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

I want to report something like vandalism, but don't know where, so I'm doing it here

I noticed a "bad edit" on the page Weetamoo (she was a Native American tribal princess/queen in New England, Puritan times); I reverted the edit thinking "assume good faith". Then I realized that the edit looked like a poorly attempted citation, and the source was absolutely not encyclopedic (it's now a dead link, but something like https://web.archive.org/web/20170329044918/http://royalwomen.tripod.com/id7.html ) so I looked more and noticed the numerous other edits by the same user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Wheeligrl18 , and there is some absolute trash in there, like "Weetamoo was an early example of gender fluidity" with no citation.

I got your name from an earlier kerfuffel on related pages with related users like Indigenous_Girl (who is no longer active) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive311#Buffs,_Indigenous_Girl_and_CorbieVreccan

you seem like you are not insane, so I thought perhaps you'd know where to point this. I (without a login) didn't want to start doing bulk reverts, and i'm not an expert on the topic anyway. The Talk page and the page itself seem to be not looked after by anybody reliable 98.7.197.219 (talk) 02:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Tripod is pretty categorically not a reliable source. As a teenager, I wrote a choose-your-own-adventure space odyssey on Tripod...just to ensure I never had a girlfriend. At any rate, the first step is to talk to the person, which is usually a pretty good move in most any disagreement. If that's unproductive, you might want to post on the talk page at WP:NDN. As a last resort, you could try posting at WP:ANI if the issues are systemic and attempts at discussion are entirely unproductive. Just be aware that ANI is unequivocally the worst place on the entire project, where time and effort go to die. But it does occasionally resolve things without making a bigger mess than there was to begin with. GMGtalk 11:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gabonese Football Federation Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gabonese Football Federation Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 22:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

  • Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
    User Hawkeye7 opens up on his experience as a media representative following the Australian team at the latest Summer Paralympics in Paris.
  • News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
    More changes to RfA on the way in October, final results for the U4C elections revealed, and other news from the Wikimedia world.

RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

  • In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
    Perplexing persistence, pay to play, potential president's possible plagiarism, crossword crossover to culture, and a wish come true!
  • Book review: The Editors
    A novel about us, from the point of view of three of us.

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Good Humor
I, too, like being included. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 02:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

  • Op-ed: On the backrooms
    An editor's reflection on social capital and their changing relationship with Wikipedia culture. by Tamzin

Road Eye Land.

That odd category tag you nuked actually had something behind it, even if the something was more than a bit stupid. Rhode Island simplified its name more or less at the same time as the George Floyd protests, dropping the reference to the Providence Plantations, lest someone be triggered by the word “plantation.” Qwirkle (talk) 06:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Autism.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Oolong (talk) 16:13, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks but no thanks. Saying I was done with the discussion wasn't a rhetorical tactic. No bar against my deciding to revisit the page at some point, weeks? months? But I've learned that letting things go is a virtue here, especially now when I'm hundreds of miles from home for the holidays. Things eventually get resolved, and in my experience an unwarranted sense of urgency creates a great deal more problems than it solves. Those who would like my opinion are invited to review the talk page. GMGtalk 13:20, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

improve page Khiram village in Anantnag district union territory of Jammu and Kashmir, India

I edited this page on information which I first published on medium.com and Google Docs I wrote information based on my late grandmother views on my village shrine which I belong to so this information about shrine attributed to Prophet in Islam Mohammed where its believed there's is relic of Prophet now Wikipedia is raising many issues with that page if someone will remove those links where my original article was written based on my grandmother's views it will be wrong people make different perspectives about that article to maintain its original Author behind and with maintaining Wikipedias standards please improve this page Syed Abdul Jaleel Shah (talk) 13:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

I think you need to discuss this with whomever it is you have the disagreement. I don't know that I have ever edited this topic, or have the relevant competence to contribute in this area. GMGtalk 14:33, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello GreenMeansGo, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025.
Happy editing,

Abishe (talk) 22:55, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 22:55, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2024

Wounded Knee Massacre

Please do not continue to edit war on this page. There is an ongoing talk page discussion, as well as other editors that have reverted the edit warring single purpose IP account. Please also disclose if that is your IP that you are using. As that would constitute socking. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:12, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Per WP:ONUS, it is your responsibility to argue why this stable version should be changed to your preferred version which is not backed up by either consensus nor the majority of the sources. You should get involved in the discussion and self-revert for now, or this risks immediate escalation to ANI. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
I think you need to re read ONUS. GMGtalk 17:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
I will quote it for you, since you don't appear to like quoting anything, "The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content. Since I am arguing in favor of retaining the stable lead, and YOU are edit warring it to a NEW lead, then it is up to you to achieve consensus before we move to a NEW lead.
Please self-revert immediately. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Go to the talk page. I'm not carrying on this discussion in two different places. GMGtalk 17:23, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Fair enough. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Iljhgtn (talk) 18:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Clinic for Special Children logo 2018.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Clinic for Special Children logo 2018.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SilverDoor Apartments company logo 2017.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SilverDoor Apartments company logo 2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

The Signpost: 7 February 2025

  • News and notes: Let's talk!
    The WMF executive team delivers a new update; plus, the latest EU policy report, good-bye to the German Wikipedia's Café, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
  • Community view: 24th Wikipedia Day in New York City
    Wikimedians and newbies celebrate 24 years of Wikipedia in the Brooklyn Central Library. Special guests Stephen Harrison and Clay Shirky joined in conversation.
  • Traffic report: A wild drive
    The start of the year was filled with a few unfortunate losses, tragic disasters, emerging tech forces and A LOT of politics.

The Signpost: 27 February 2025

  • Technology report: Hear that? The wikis go silent twice a year
    From patrolling new edits to uploading photos or joining a campaign, you can count on the Wikimedia platform to be up and running — in your language, anywhere in the world. That is, except for a couple of minutes during the equinoctes.
  • Opinion: Sennecaster's RfA debriefing
    User Sennecaster shares her thoughts on her recent RfA and the aspects that might have played a role in making it successful.

The Signpost: 22 March 2025

  • From the editor: Hanami
    It's an ecstasy, my spring.
  • Obituary: Rest in peace
    Send not to know
    For whom the bell tolls,
    It tolls for thee.

Orphaned non-free image File:Road Redemption video game logo 2017.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Road Redemption video game logo 2017.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

Image descriptions

You should finish adding image descriptions to your page. I did one for you: [1] Anthony2106 (talk) 10:58, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

I'm indifferent. My user page is far too stupid for most people to peruse. GMGtalk 12:22, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
What about blind people? Anthony2106 (talk) 14:33, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
I'm not unsympathetic to blind people. I just don't care about my user page. I set it up years ago and have barely touched it. GMGtalk 14:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
We shouldn't feel empathetic[2] but just acknowledge that the page is less fun for them and it could be upsetting. Maybe I could write some for you later. Anthony2106 (talk) 01:30, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
Not trying to be a scold, but with respect to user pages, this is generally the sort of thing where you should mention it once and then move on. I understand your point, but arguing about it (even with a hefty degree of nominal civilly) is tantamount to simply coming out of nowhere to berate GMG over not sharing your priorities, which you might recognize isn't a very civil thing to do. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 14:06, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
At the end of the day, there are very many articles in mainspace that I'm sure are not compliant with accessibility standards. Nobody is going to be meaningfully impoverished by not having an image description on my userpage about how the Wikipedia mobile app kills puppies. GMGtalk 17:36, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
I thought every time you masturbate God kills a kitten, I didn't know the Wikipedia app kills puppies. Also I wasn't trying to beraid you over this and since I'm the only one botherd by it, I'll write the descriptions. Anthony2106 (talk) 11:03, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Go for it. But make them amusing. GMGtalk 12:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Honestly, now you're tempting me to get in on it... ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 14:03, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
It's not too stupid for me to peruse! Wait a minute... ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 15:04, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

See, this is what happens when you use the lower-price spread. Who ever heard of a watchcat? Get quality household gods. Bring back Mr. Fuzzybottom! Qwirkle (talk) 17:22, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

But...it's a cute picture... GMGtalk 17:33, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:51, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Why the revert?

I noticed that my edit on Clickbait was reverted by you. The reason was "We don't really offer guidance on specific products or services", even though I didn't offer any guidance and just cited the sources. Could you elaborate? Dabmasterars (talk) 16:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

@Dabmasterars: The content wasn't about the subject of the article in the broad sense of an encyclopedic overview, but about a specific service. It's related to the subject of the article, but not actually about the subject. For example, we wouldn't go to Athlete's foot and offer extended advice about specific commercial products used to treat the condition. GMGtalk 21:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

  • Traffic report: Of Wolf and Man
    Television dramas, televised sports, film, the Pope, and ... bioengineering at the top of the list?

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

Orphaned non-free image File:Wye Valley Brewery Logo 2017.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wye Valley Brewery Logo 2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 17:01, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 June 2025

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

  • Traffic report: God only knows
    Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?

Robert Costa

Hi- you've done a nice job on Robert Costa of CBS's page. Any chance you could find a more updated photo of him for that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flanner1989 (talkcontribs) 19:26, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

@Flanner1989: I'm not seeing much online as far as freely licensed images go. You could always see if there's contact information to reach out to him or somebody from his office. If they're willing, they can release an image they own the rights to by following the instructions at c:COM:CONSENT. GMGtalk 19:44, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 August 2025

Nomination for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User talk:Timothyjosephwood and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

The Signpost: 9 September 2025

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on 29 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User talk:Timothyjosephwood and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

The Signpost: 2 October 2025

The Signpost: 20 October 2025

  • Traffic report: One click after another
    Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.

November article improvement drive

Starting on 1 November, the month-long 2025 Article Improvement Drive will target a number of content improvement areas and backlogs. Participating editors will be in line for barnstars and other awards; articles from all aspects of the project will be eligible so there will be something for everybody. Interested editors are encouraged to sign up now! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:18, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User talk:Timothyjosephwood and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

The Signpost: 10 November 2025