 | |
| Wikipedia ads | file info – #69 |
| This is Fritzmann2002's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
 Archives |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
Hello can I edit anything and what are the guides --Jay John Mulama (talk) 11:39, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! This is Arimslu! I'm new here, and my main goal as of right now is to update wiki pages for shows to include all their opening and ending themes, as I myself have had issues finding them, and would like to make it easier for others in the future. Right now, however, I'm having another issue. I want to add an external link to the wiki page for "Yamishibai: Japanese Horror Stories", but every time I try, it only adds as a "potential template". Do you know how to fix this? I copied the code exactly from the previous external link, only changing the title, link, and name. --Arimslu (talk) 18:44, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm new to this and I may need some help/real feedback. I have submitted a first page (about a deceased Romanian mathematician) with what I thought being reliable references to support the text of the submitted page. It is true that some references are in Romanian (there is also a Romanian wikipedia page for the same mathematician, but being new here I'm not allowed to provide a Wikipedia translation for it). I do not have a lot of experience in building wikipedia pages, so any constructive help, including improving the article, would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance! --Syzygies33 (talk) 01:17, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am sajad mohebi I am a student --Sajad Mohebi (talk) 11:03, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
how do i edit creation --Skyalliance31 (talk) 17:14, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My recent article was declined but I appreciated the feedback since it was my first. How do I revise my submission or do I start again? --Drdanikatynes (talk) 17:00, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, me again, I tried to publish with suggested edits and I received a "Warning: This page should probably be moved to the Draft namespace." I tried to move to the draft space but didn't have permissions. Can you advise on how to go the correct route? --Drdanikatynes (talk) 17:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Fritzmann2002, I have been working a lot on Draft:Thanasis Deligiannis, rewriting it and incorporating all sources I had gathered through the past months. Would you have time to have a look at it? Any feedback would be helpful before submitting it. Kamien Case (talk) 23:15, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I want to ask about when, how and why to edit an article. And what if my edit wrong, did I can get punish for it or what happens.Thanks for your time and your guidance. --AfiqDenis (talk) 06:31, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I have a PDF file that I want to use as a source for a wiki article, but I’m not sure how to turn it into a proper citation. --Sergggs16 (talk) 03:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I'm trying to upload the logo of Playboy Club (the company I am working for) and I cannot. Could you assist me please? It seems that my account is not auto-verified yet and I cannot do it. --PMCenterfold (talk) 08:08, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I’m a professional footballer and I’m trying to create my own Wikipedia page. Is that a bad idea?
What do you recommend? --Clvnbrtt9999 (talk) 13:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello I am so happy I can do this. --JoshTheCreatorX (talk) 19:15, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello it’s my first time to publish a Wikipedia page. I made a traduction in English of a Georgian page explaining Tamishi Battle, it is good ? --B.Gujejiani (talk) 15:38, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello --Kashanhey (talk) 17:12, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Candidates.
Here is the schedule:
Please note the following:
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Fritzmann2002, I have just opened the GA review for Oncantias. This is my first GA review, and I would appreciate if you could support me during the process. Thank you AndersenAnders (talk) 18:25, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:17, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2025 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Correction: nominations are open until 23:59 (UTC) on 14 December 2025. 
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:20, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion phase of the December 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Discussion phase.
On December 9, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which typically lasts between a couple days and a week. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate who has not been recalled must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. A candidate that has been recalled must have at least 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello mentor. How’s your day doing . I have a question if I could put images outside wiki media commons . Please and thank you --BlueCoolJays (talk) 23:22, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Cargo ships by company has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SMasonGarrison 14:01, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The voting phase of the December 2025 administrator elections has started and will continue until Dec 15 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/December 2025/Voting phase.
As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2025. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:54, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey I'm in an NJROTC program for a school id like to create a page on the schools njrotc program am I allowed to if I make sure to avoid COI also is a certain schools njrotc program relevant enough --Retrocollections (talk) 18:49, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. How do I write an article? --DudeX96 (talk) 08:20, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 23:31, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2026 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here, and a bot will set up your submissions page within one day, ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.
For the 2026 WikiCup, the highest-ranking contestants will receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. This is the same scoring system that we had last year. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants are no longer eliminated at the end of each round.
The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @Fritzmann2002. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 11 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey and a blessed New Year. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 17:15, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
What are your top 3 Wikipedia tools/tips that help you write and edit pages effectively and efficiently? --Kai Reijmers (talk) 15:09, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 22:47, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
| Good article nominations | February 2026 Backlog Drive |  |
February 2026 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted a good article review in the past year or participated in the previous backlog drive. | |
-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there! I wanted to upload the official logo and coat of arms of the institution of Riga Stradins University but unfortunately could not do it because I need some kind of a permission from the university. Is that correct and why is that ? --John303134 (talk) 20:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Announcements from other communities: Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 09:28, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.
Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:
Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,467 round points, largely gained from 1 featured article, 5 featured lists, 15 good articles, and 42 FAC and GAN reviews;
Olliefant (submissions) with 1,246 round points, largely from 4 featured lists, 9 good articles, 2 featured topic articles, 4 did you know articles, and 75 FAC and GAN reviews;
Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, largely from 3 featured articles, 6 good articles, and 5 did you know articles;
MCE89 (submissions) with 848 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 32 FAC and GAN reviews; and
Rollinginhisgrave (submissions) with 838 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 14 FAC, GAN, and peer reviews.The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.
Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
 | |
| Four years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:10, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Announcements from other communities: Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:14, 29 March 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Thank you for giving such a thoughtful review, it's been a pleasure working with you too! I like your idea to create a Wikipedia page for Ptolemaic cleruchy, that might be next on the list for me. Edward056686 (talk) 04:06, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Candidates.
Here is the schedule:
Please note the following:
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The second round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 April. As a reminder for contestants who just joined or are unaware of recent changes to our round-points system, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.
Round 2 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; nine scored over 500; and fourteen scored over 300. The top seven contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:
MCE89 (submissions) with 1,333 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography Generalissima (submissions) with 1,169 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to shipping ethics controversy in fanfiction, waterways, and Gu Yanwu Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,149 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, and featured lists about figure skating, along with many article reviews and two good topics Olliefant (submissions) with 830 points, mainly from good and featured articles about television shows, episodes and media, along with nearly four dozen good and featured article reviews
Gommeh (submissions) with 827 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to Genshin Impact and Honkai: Star RailThe full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 13 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 106 good articles, 22 good-topic articles and more than 40 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 3 In the News articles, and they have conducted over 200 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Announcements from other communities:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Chocmilk03 (talk 04:44, 30 April 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
sup --GeneralGrievous5 (talk) 18:07, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I want to do this more often but I don't have someone to direct me I don't have enough equipments for editing --T.SYRESEBIT (talk) 18:07, 4 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, how can I change an article's title? The article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Majorca needs to be changed to Kingdom of Mallorca. --Angry Islander (talk) 14:06, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! If I type some content myself in Word and then copy-paste it here, will that also be considered 'copied material'? --GreatBone (talk) 09:23, 7 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Fritzmann2002! I just submitted my first new page in a little while- I think I did this through a different mechanism previously, during my Wikipedia class (Science Wikieditors). Before, my page went live right away- and now, mine is in a queue for review. Did I skip this step previously because I was in a course, and now I'm just working at this on my own? Or, did I go about creating this page (through the new page wizard) the wrong way? the new page is for the gene DHX30. Thanks :) --Purpleptaters (talk) 21:25, 7 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion phase of the May 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Discussion phase.
On 13 May, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The voting phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until 19 May 2026 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Voting phase.
As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I have marked you as "away" in the mentorship interface as you haven't edited in a while and unanswered mentor questions are piling up. If you return to activity, please feel free to re-mark yourself as active via Special:MentorDashboard. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:31, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed the page in your sandbox is has a cite to selinawamucii.com and if you come back to edit it into an article for the mainspace, I think you should know that's a LLM generated website and is quite unreliable. Other LLM generated sites about plants I've noticed include botanicalrealm.com, plantiary.com, greg.app, and Botanikks. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 17:49, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I am contacting you because you previously voted in elections related to the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C). You may be eligible to vote in the current U4C election, which is open now and closes on 2 June 2026. You can find out more about the candidates and the election on the election page on Meta, and from there you can access the vote itself. Your participation in these elections is important to the governance of Wikimedia communities, and your time spent learning about the candidates and voting is appreciated.
-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) (talk)
Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
| Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive | |
| June 2026 Backlog Drive:
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can sign up here. | |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Announcements, tips, participation... Announcements from other communities: Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
