User talk:Entidalumen

CS1 error on Outlast Technologies

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Outlast Technologies, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:28, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it :)

Thank you!!! Entidalumen (talk) 00:37, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Your involvement in AfDs are always encouraged. But you need to sign your comments. And highlight your position, Keep or Delete etc. Happy editing.BabbaQ (talk) 08:23, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, thank you very much for your thoughtful note; I especially appreciate it coming from a user with your experience :) Point taken—going forward I’ll make sure to sign my comments and clearly state my position in AfDs. I’ll do my best to be a constructive, responsible member of the community. Big hug! Entidalumen (talk) 13:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC) (my new sign!!!)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited André M. Levesque, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Order of Military Merit was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 00:29, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

AML

Thank you for your edits to André M. Levesque, very good work. OrangeWaylon (talk) 03:30, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hellos! OrangeWaylon — thank you, thank you s a ton for taking the time to leave me a message!!!! I really appreciate the recognition, and it genuinely motivates a laaat me to keep working on improving articles whenever I can. Entidalumen (talk) 02:36, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I mistakenly removed the subheaders from the page when I was cleaning up your edits. You can add them back if you want. Piece of advice: You don't have to state the name of the source at the beginning of every sentence, the reference is enough. OrangeWaylon (talk) 04:55, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

March 2026

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Wofai Samuel, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 19:44, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message and for the courteous notice Di2000 :)

I apologize: in my eagerness to improve and correct articles, I may have made test edits or unsuitable changes, even if I intended to fix them later, as i always Try. I understand the guidance and it will not happen again. Thank you so much again!

Entidalumen (talk) 01:04, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Speederzzz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent additions to the page Lilly Pulitzer was removed because it appeared to be in a language other than English. We can only accept English-language text on this version of Wikipedia; if you would like to contribute to a Wikipedia in another language, please visit the list of Wikipedias and see if a version of Wikipedia exists in your desired language. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 12:51, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, thank you for your message and for taking the time to write to me :).

I sincerely regret the errors in my recent edits :( I understand the concern, and it will not happen again. I really appreciate your time and the courtesy of letting me know. Have a great day!!!

Entidalumen (talk) 14:33, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Entidalumen, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 18:12, 7 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

hELLLO!!! The welcome message and your message both deserve my deepest thanks, REALLY! I work hard to become an excellent editor who learns from my achievements because I receive multiple compliments which inspire my ongoing growth and work :). The Wikipedia community and its collaborative editing environment make me feel completely at home. I want to continue my development so I can increase my project contributions. Thank you again and all of you! Entidalumen (talk) 12:30, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Angiebichi per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angiebichi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 09:06, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Entidalumen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello to all! I request a block review because I think the block results from either a misunderstanding or an error. I have worked hard to build Wikipedia content through my editing while I have studied Wikipedia rules because I realy want to learn proper contribution methods. I have edited during my own free even from various places like the library and the café/bar of my workplace during the day, encouraged by my friends who had Wikipedia knowledse (o some al leat) because I want to create useful articles time this noy only as a simple reader. Was my own time... If I have made any procedural mistake, am willing to correct them and to follow whatever guidance is necessary in order to edit in compliance with Wikipedia's rules. I know that Im still inexperienced,, but I have invested a great time in my learning and contributing, and having to start over from the beginning would seem unfair to me. thank you for your time Entidalumen (talk) 14:07, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Starting over from the beginning would be block evasion, so please don't. But this does not address the evidence discussed in the SPI, which is not just the location of your editing. 331dot (talk) 09:07, 11 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.