User talk:Enmanuelgac

More citations needed

I see you have added this template to a number of cruise line articles. They all appear adequately cited to me so I am going to revert them. If there are any statements in the articles which you feel specifically need a source please add the citation needed template next to them Lyndaship (talk) 10:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks @Lyndaship 👍 Enmanuelgac (talk) 19:35, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. An edit that you recently made to Talk:Royal Caribbean International seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

👍 Enmanuelgac (talk) 23:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Royal Caribbean International. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:42, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Right, I understand... I will to do the correct following the wiki rules 👍 Enmanuelgac (talk) 07:46, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Czello ^(music) 09:18, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Cruises as an industry

Not as far as wikipedia is concerned, it is a sub-group of tourism and the link you supply is not to an industry but the means of supplying it. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 08:13, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Your next link mearly describes what it is, not the industry it is in. And I'll thank you not to make snide and rude comments in edit summaries. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 07:33, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Tinkering

for heaven's sake stop tinkering with the infoboxes. If you want to experiment use your sandbox Murgatroyd49 (talk) 08:06, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 09:04, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Enmanuelgac reported by User:Czello (Result: ). Thank you. — Czello ^(music) 09:21, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for using articles as sandboxes and edit warring..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Courcelles (talk) 10:43, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

• If you want to tinker, please create a user sandbox. You can be unblocked once you develop some more skill in making edits. Also, you must not edit war. Courcelles (talk) 10:44, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Enmanuelgac (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

Hello, I feel bad for the behavior of this user Murgatroyd49 who tries to prevent me from providing clear and updated information about the Royal Caribbean company and what this user has done, according to what I see, is a way of appropriating those public Wikipedia topics that anyone can edit and seeing that I am editing a lot, he tries to prevent me from editing in the topics again, because I am a Wikipedian just like him, but in my new case... he is abusing his experience to not edit in those topics and misinform because he thinks he is right about some things from the general point of view and not from the point of view of this user Murgatroyd49. I hope how read this understand me, tks! Enmanuelgac (talk) 08:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. Your request should only discuss your actions. 331dot (talk) 08:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In the meantime you attempt to circumvent your block by editing while logged out - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Enmanuelgac - an accusation which you have not denied. You don't even address your own behaviour and how it resulted in the block, you just blame @Murgatroyd49, an editor who is in good standing. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:35, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Please 10mmsocket,with all due respect, don't defend it and do not stick to this case, you have been on the English Wikipedia for a long time... May this case be resolved by a user without bias. Enmanuelgac (talk) 08:41, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

It is not about bias. It is about addressing the behaviour of editors who refuse to accept when they are in the wrong, who edit war, and who engage in sockpuppetry. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

you right Enmanuelgac (talk) 08:45, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

• Hmm. Due to a technical limitation, I seem to be unable to apply a site-wide temporary block on top of the existing indefinite block from article space. So, I am in a quandary - do I impose a site-wide indefinite block, or do I just give you a warning that any future instances of editing article space while logged out will result in an indef site-wide block? How about this: if you undertake never to edit article space again while not logged in until such time as the block is lifted, I will be content to leave it at that. Do you agree to that? Girth Summit _(blether) 09:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

  @Girth SummitAt this point I’d just indef as NOTHERE. Courcelles (talk) 13:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

  I've got no concerns if you want to go ahead and do that, Courcelles. Girth Summit _(blether) 14:35, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Courcelles (talk) 14:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

For evading the partial block to make even more useless edits, this is now a sitewide, indef block. Courcelles (talk) 14:43, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Enmanuelgac (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)

---

Request reason:

I promise not to edit the Royal Caribbean articles again, where the problem began, to respect the rules of Wikipedia and the ideas of fellow Wikipedians.

Decline reason:

Your unblock request will need to directly, and specifically, address the reasons you were blocked and what you plan to do differently in the future. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 08:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Enmanuelgac (talk) 20:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #115495

is open Globally locked. Message left for blocking admin. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:25, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Not locked. Merely blocked.

Unblocking.

Unblock request carried over:

"2026-08-24 01:17:20 Hello, I was blocked on English Wikipedia after engaging in an edit war and subsequently evading a partial block. I repeatedly reverted disputed edits instead of stopping and using the article's talk page or the appropriate dispute-resolution processes. I also failed to respect the restrictions of my partial block. I understand now that both actions were serious mistakes. If given another opportunity, I would respect all blocks and restrictions without attempting to circumvent them, stop reverting when an edit dispute arises, discuss disagreements with other editors, and seek assistance through the appropriate processes when necessary. My intended contributions would be constructive and non-contentious, such as improving existing articles, correcting factual information, adding reliable sources, fixing grammar and formatting, and making useful improvements based on reliable sources. I accept responsibility for my actions and understand that I need to rebuild trust through my future conduct.

Enmanuelgac 2026-08-24 01:20:55 No, I edit on my own behalf. I have no intention of editing on behalf of the Dominican Republic government or any other entity. I previously had a potential job opportunity at DIECOM (the Dominican Government's Directorate of Strategy and Governmental Communication) that involved working on Wikipedia articles related to the Dominican state. However, I did not make those edits on behalf of DIECOM or the government. If my account is unblocked, my intention is to edit independently." deepfriedokra -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:33, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Welcome back -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:36, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the opportunity. I'm happy about this news and will contribute to this project by following the rules. This is an important step towards advocating for global unlocking; you won't regret this decision. 👍🏽 Enmanuelgac (talk) 16:23, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra Could you perhaps have a quick dig through the logs for this user? They're still showing as blocked when using the "show blocked users" userscript... might be a script fault, but perhaps something in the block log? Danners430 _{tweaks made} 07:15, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Still globally blocked, except here. So, maybe that's why. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:21, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Ah makes sense - as long as it's on the radar and not an oversight… we're all human after all :) Danners430 _{tweaks made} 08:22, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Looking at the section below . . . . -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:29, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

@Danners430: Last edited yesterday. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:33, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Aye but not currently blocked on en-wiki - just wanted to make sure something hadn't been missed when unblocking, that's all :-) Danners430 _{tweaks made} 08:41, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

September 2026

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Johnny Pacheco. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 00:01, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Binksternet#c-Enmanuelgac-20260914000400-Johnny_Pacheco Enmanuelgac (talk) 00:07, 14 September 2026 (UTC)

Hi Enmanuelgac! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Las Américas International Airport and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 16:39, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Danners430, I understand; thanks for the correction. Enmanuelgac (talk) 03:13, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Dominican Republic), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chancellery was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

"fixed info"

Use better summaries, especially if you are not fixing information. Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 02:29, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Reverting edits

Hello! I can't find any reason for the inclusion of standard/non-notable honorific prefixes on personal infoboxes. Reverting every edit of mine isn't constructive to the discussion. Why do you think these prefixes should be included? Thanks! CalebHerrington (talk) 04:42, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CalebHerrington#c-Enmanuelgac-20260929044400-reversals_of_presidential_honorific_prefixes Enmanuelgac (talk) 04:46, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

WikiProject Latin music invitation

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

Erick (talk) 08:31, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

October 2026

Heyo. Regarding your recent edits to Miriam Cruz when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Specifying |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= needs to be defined in the template in order to work. You can look at the documentation for the template being used, but it is also helpful to use the preview button before saving an edit; this helps find any errors that have been made and ensures that the values added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is highly recommended that editors use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions of if I can help explain further, please let me know! Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:07, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

I don't understand mate ? Enmanuelgac (talk) 22:13, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Not sure how on earth I can be more descriptive than that... Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:13, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

chill man, explain more especificaly what I did wrong cuz my english is not good u know Enmanuelgac (talk) 22:15, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

|alias= is not a valid parameter. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:19, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

that was all. u surprised me. ok, next time I will indulgent 👍 Enmanuelgac (talk) 22:21, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to make edits with misleading or inaccurate edit summaries, even if unintentional, you may be blocked from editing. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:28, 16 October 2026 (UTC)

Heyo. Regarding your recent edits to Roberto Salcedo Jr. when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Specifying |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= needs to be defined in the template in order to work. You can look at the documentation for the template being used, but it is also helpful to use the preview button before saving an edit; this helps find any errors that have been made and ensures that the values added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is highly recommended that editors use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions of if I can help explain further, please let me know! Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 01:52, 23 October 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Estadio Quisqueya Juan Marichal

added links pointing to Frank Howard, Miguel Diaz, Henry Rodríguez, Gustavo Martínez and Juan Brito

Dominican dembow

added a link pointing to Puerto Rican

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Estadio Quisqueya Juan Marichal

added links pointing to Henry Rodríguez, Gustavo Martínez and Juan Brito

Que Levante La Mano

added a link pointing to Escuchame

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 12 October 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Enmanuelgac! Your additions to Government of the Dominican Republic have been removed in whole or in part, because they contained copyright violations. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, we take copyright very seriously. You cannot copy text from your sources. Everything you contribute needs to be written in your own words, and avoid too close paraphrasing. If you own the copyright of the content you want to use, please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.

Continuing to violate our copyright policy may lead you to be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:59, 16 October 2026 (UTC)

Ok, I understand, thks u 👍🏽 Enmanuelgac (talk) 15:36, 16 October 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cabinet of the Dominican Republic

added a link pointing to Raquel Peña

Ensanche La Fe

added a link pointing to San Martín

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

Your reverts on the 'Ministry of Education (Dominican Republic)' article

Hi. I corrected an error you made in the 'Infobox government agency' template. You undid it and I had to correct it again.

Then you put the coord template inside the infobox template. I corrected it and you undid it. While it works inside the 'headquarters' parameter, it's messy editing.

Perhaps before reverting an edit you could check out why it was made in the first place? — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 20:01, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

Hi colleague @Itzcuauhtli11, sorry for not getting back to you sooner. I’ve reverted your two edits because the caption—where the institution’s logo should be—links to the logos, and you removed it. Also, regarding the coord, I prefer to place it at the top, as it doesn’t look right at the bottom. Enmanuelgac (talk) 15:54, 20 October 2026 (UTC)

Yes, the link to the logo was not right, but the infobox needs only one named parameter; two with the same name causes errors.

The headquarter parameter in the infobox should only include the city and country. It's not for the address. You could review the purpose of infoboxes here: MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE. They should include the minimal information to quickly summarize the article. If you alter the infobox format, it weakens its purpose. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 16:15, 20 October 2026 (UTC)

Undoing my edits to the article on the Modern Revolutionary Party article

Why do you keep undoing my edits to the article on the Modern Revolutionary Party? What centre-right measures has it implemented? Providing subsidies for everything, giving away free household appliances during the election campaign, imposing price controls, and nationalising companies are NOT centre-right measures; they are more in line with centre-left social democracy, and you know it. Yet every time I post links to the article, you remove them anonymously or from your personal account. I want a detailed explanation of why you are doing this. Oli (talk) 22:52, 22 October 2026 (UTC)

No, dear colleague, you are mistaken; it is simply the reversion of an edit concerning the party's spokesperson in the Senate—I reverted it and added a reference. @OliverDF Enmanuelgac (talk) 22:57, 22 October 2026 (UTC)

Am I mistaken? The article itself states that the PRM is a member of the São Paulo Forum, an organisation made up solely of left-wing and centre-left parties – so why would a centre-right party, as the PRM is supposedly, be a member of that group? Every time I made edits adding sources to the article stating that the PRM is centre-left, within a few hours my edits were reverted by both anonymous and registered users, giving the impression that they are doing it on purpose simply because it is me. Oli (talk) 20:26, 23 October 2026 (UTC)

Alright brother, if you think it’s wrong, then edit it however you see fit and add references that support what you’re telling me, simple as that. Enmanuel (My talk page • My contributions) 10:47, 24 October 2026 (UTC)