User talk:Devidboon1987

February 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on S. M. Kamrul Hassan. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 08:37, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What kinda policy violate? Devidboon1987 (talk) 09:15, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Devidboon1987 reported by User:Tbhotch (Result: ). Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 08:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what is wrong going on? Can u please describe Devidboon1987 (talk) 08:56, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what kinda policy i violated describe please.. Devidboon1987 (talk) 09:03, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Devidboon1987, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:28, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vinegarymass911 hello dear..🙏🙏 Great full to u..i need ur kind support Devidboon1987 (talk) 14:23, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Vinegarymass911need ue help Devidboon1987 (talk) 14:42, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:00, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please me and guide me Devidboon1987 (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot accept content plagiarised from another website (it conflicts with our copyright licensing, and in this case was effectively promotional), and content about living persons MUST be properly sourced to news/scholarly sources that explicitly corroborate it. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 16:28, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jéské Couriano i shared top news portal source of Bangladesh.. and as a army person a lots of data is not public...what have to do.. Devidboon1987 (talk) 16:35, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How about not blindly editing in such a way that a relatively well-sourced article is replaced with one that's essentially unsourced and plagiarised? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 16:58, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]