User talk:Data Devourer

undesirable wikilink

In your recent edit of Bebionic, you added a wikilink for Germany.

There are a couple of issues with this addition:

You've got two consecutive wikilinks. There is guidance against this.
Per WP:Manual of Style/Linking#Overlinking, countries should not be wikilinked (though I think this is subject to some discretion. OTOH, if you're wikilinking the city, then it's kind of unnecessary to wikilink the country.

FWIW, I know there's a section on the "overlink crisis", but I don't think this is a real thing. There seems to be much more encouragement to wikilink whenever possible, subject to wikilinking a given term only once per article. (Note that when wikilinking items in citations, such as the author's name, wikilinking each occurrence is the expected practice.) Fabrickator (talk) 23:35, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, sorry about that. should I get rid of it? Data Devourer (talk) 20:39, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes... also, I'd suggest rewriting "Kingston of Hull man, Mike Swainger, was ...", changing "man" to "resident" and omitting the offsetting commas surrounding "Mike Swainger". In its current form, it's kind of awkward. Fabrickator (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got It. Data Devourer (talk) 21:41, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Data Devourer! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 20:38, Thursday, September 14, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

March 2024

Hello, I'm Remsense. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks. Redlinks are useful and can often be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" link (in the tools listed at the left in desktop view) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Please only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Remsense诉 21:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, so sorry, I will stop doing that now. Thanks for telling me. Data Devourer (talk) 22:22, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message from ExclusiveEditor

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § ‎AI for WP guidelines/ policies. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 15:10, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for inviting me to talk in this discussion, but I don't think I can say anything useful. Also, why are you asking me? Data Devourer (talk) 22:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My guess is because of your userbox :) GoldRomean (talk) 01:12, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fan POV

Regarding this diff... Template:Fan POV may be what you're looking for! GoldRomean (talk) 01:13, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Data Devourer (talk) 03:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Data Devourer! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Why Can I Only Edit Source?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:12, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Hello, I'm Arcrev1, and welcome to Wikipedia. I appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Dawn Zulueta, it appears that you added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. - Arcrev1 (talk) 15:48, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I'll remember that next time Data Devourer (talk) 03:14, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]