User talk:Crustytuna

Welcome!

Hi Crustytuna! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Ekdalian (talk) 13:14, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hi Crustytuna! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Langah Sultanate and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 13:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The edit i made was the in the original source i used earlier. It was missing some words.Thank you for correcting me there. I will be careful with that next time. Crustytuna (talk) 22:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not do wikilinks like this "Tribal chief|Robber chief" (in Fateh Khan Jat page). Robber chief is not a synonym to "tribal chief" and not explained in the article Tribal chief, see the guideline MOS:EASTEREGG. --Altenmann >talk 08:14, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you I will correct my mistake. Crustytuna (talk) 12:34, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crustytuna. I noticed that you edited the Muslim Jats page and removed mention of 'Muley Jats', citing that it was derogatory. This was done previously too (see here), but without any cited sources. If you have evidence that it is a pejorative term, we can specify that. Otherwise, please do not remove mention of it, as it is certainly a term that exists to describe those Muslim Jats who live in India. I assume you have evidence beyond original research, so I will withhold from reversing your edit for a while. Thanks. --Ironborn392 (talk)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Crustytuna! Your additions to Mirza Sahiban have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Also on Hafiz Barkhurdar Ranjha Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 16:05, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:DaudRanjha per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DaudRanjha. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 18:25, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Crustytuna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I would like to clarify that I am not a sockpuppet of DaudRanjha, nor do i have any other accounts than this. I would like the admins to reconsider the suspicion and any similarity in topic focus is coincidental. No evidence was found on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DaudRanjha/Archive

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

((Admin help))

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Hi, It has been 7 days since i have requested an unblock but there has been no response. Can any Admin help me here please. Thank you. Crustytuna (talk) 21:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Crustytuna, please be patient, there are more than 80 unblock requests in the queue right now, and sockpuppet cases are some of the more time-consuming ones to deal with. -- asilvering (talk) 00:02, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Appreciate the response. Crustytuna (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]