User talk:Coreg

Welcome!

Hello, Coreg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Timeline of Toronto history may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| 1989 || '''June 5''' || [[Rogers Centre]]opens (originally known as SkyDome.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Massey Medals for Architecture moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Massey Medals for Architecture. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 00:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Massey Medals for Architecture has been accepted

Massey Medals for Architecture, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 06:53, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Governor General's Medals in Architecture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Governor General's Medals in Architecture, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Governor General's Medals in Architecture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RAIC Awards (1930 to 1939) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to RAIC Awards (1930 to 1939). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 05:25, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

In response to the potential issues, please see the responses below. Please confirm that these responses qualify moving the article back to mainspace, or advise of any further clarification needed.

Thanks for your review of the article.

Cheers,

Coreg

==========================

This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. (February 2026)

---- Given the nature of the topic (awards by a national professional organization), it is unavoidably that article is closely associated with the subject and as it is information of awards won, it is not a matter of opinion so aspect of neutrality not applicable.

---- List of awards is verifiable as information was published in the journal of the professional organization and fully cited in the article.

This page only references primary sources. (February 2026)

---- Given the nature of the topic (awards by a national professional organization / awards in early 20^th century so secondary sources unlikely given topic), I don’t think this invalidates the article.

---- Noting that this information was gathered by researching the online archives of Dalhousie University and is not easily available on the general internet, either as discreet or compiled points of information.

The topic of this draft may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. (February 2026)

---- As both the RAIC organization and its various awards programs have entries in Wikipedia, notability has been acknowledged.

---- The article provides new information on the RAIC’s first awards program (later programs are included in Wikipedia) so is notable in that way as well. Coreg (talk) 19:59, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RAIC Awards (1930 to 1939) (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hurricane Wind and Fire was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the provided sources are independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RAIC Awards (1930 to 1939) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 05:11, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]