User talk:Clever-student25

Declaration of Conflict of Interest

Hello,

I would like to declare a potential conflict of interest regarding the draft article Draft:NETIS Group that I have created. I am affiliated with NETIS Group and involved in sharing accurate and verifiable information about the company. My intention is solely to contribute factual, well-sourced, and neutral content that adheres to Wikipedia's standards of verifiability and neutrality.

I understand Wikipedia's policies on conflicts of interest and promotional content, and I welcome any feedback, edits, or improvements from the community to ensure the article meets Wikipedia's encyclopedic criteria.

Thank you for your guidance and review. Clever-student25 (talk) 16:02, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Clever-student25! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 16:03, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Netis Groupe (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MCE89 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Netis Groupe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 09:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Clever-student25! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MCE89 (talk) 09:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Netis Groupe (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Netis Groupe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 10:40, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello User:Pythoncoder,

Thank you for your feedback. I have fully rewritten the draft to ensure neutrality and verifiability.

Independent secondary sources have been added (Le Matin, Les Éco, Agence Ecofin, TechAfrica News, Proparco, IFC, Amethis, AfricInvest).

The corporate tone has been removed and all text is now written in an encyclopedic style.

I would appreciate it if you could re-review this updated version.

-- Clever-student25 (talk) 10:57, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Pythoncoder. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:27, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Pythoncoder, thank you for your feedback.

I understand your concern regarding AI-generated text. The draft was indeed rewritten manually by me based on verifiable and independent sources, such as IFC, Proparco, AfricInvest, Les Éco, Agence Ecofin, and UN Global Compact.

Every statement in the article is supported by these references, and I’ve avoided any promotional or unverifiable content. If you notice any specific part that seems unclear or unsupported, I’ll be happy to revise or provide stronger sourcing.

My goal is to ensure the draft meets Wikipedia’s standards for neutrality, verifiability, and notability.

Thank you again for reviewing the article and for helping improve it. Clever-student25 (talk) 12:28, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Updated draft after full rewrite for neutrality and reliable sources

Hello,

Following the review by User:Pythoncoder, I have rewritten the entire draft of *NETIS Group* to ensure compliance with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability guidelines.

✅ The promotional tone has been removed — all content is now written in an encyclopedic and factual manner. ✅ Independent, reliable sources from established media and institutional publications have been added, including *Le Matin*, *Les Éco*, *Agence Ecofin*, *TechAfrica News*, *Proparco*, *IFC*, *Amethis*, and *AfricInvest*. ✅ Corporate language has been replaced by neutral formulations such as “according to the company” or “the company states that.” ✅ The order of references prioritizes independent media before corporate or partner sources.

I believe this version now meets the notability and neutrality criteria under WP:CORP and WP:NPOV.

Thank you for your time and review. Best regards, -- Clever-student25 (talk) 10:58, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

I ain’t reading all that AI slop. I’m happy for you though. Or sorry that happened —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:21, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Netis Groupe (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Netis Groupe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:20, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Pythoncoder, thank you for your feedback.

I understand your concern regarding AI-generated text. The draft was indeed rewritten manually by me based on verifiable and independent sources, such as IFC, Proparco, AfricInvest, Les Éco, Agence Ecofin, and UN Global Compact.

Every statement in the article is supported by these references, and I’ve avoided any promotional or unverifiable content. If you notice any specific part that seems unclear or unsupported, I’ll be happy to revise or provide stronger sourcing.

My goal is to ensure the draft meets Wikipedia’s standards for neutrality, verifiability, and notability.

Thank you again for reviewing the article and for helping improve it. Clever-student25 (talk) 12:39, 5 November 2025 (UTC)