User talk:Cinaroot/Archive 1

Archive 1

User talk page archives?

Hello, Cinaroot,

I see from your edit summaries that you are archiving your User talk page. That is a great habit, most long-time editors do that. Since you are archiving messages from your User talk page, could you have a box for your talk page archives listed on your User talk page?

It also helps if you make it searchable so that editors (and you) can easily find old messages that have been posted. If you want to see how to set this up, I have this system displayed on my own User talk page so you can just copy the template information from there. Thank you. Not blanking your User talk page is a sign that you plan on being around for a long time on the project. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:27, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

I haven't quite figured out how to do it yet. I will definitely do it next time. Cinaroot (talk) 03:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Additional UNWRA photo?

Hi Cinaroot, I may have missed the opportunity to request photos, in which case no worries. However, if it's still possible could this image be requested? It depicts the damaged Helmi Saqr Sultan Mosque (based on aerial photos as the dome is quite distinct and the position of the single minaret and nearby buildings looks correct). It's on the outskirts of the Tel al-Sultan refugee camp in Rafah. The sign at the front mentions polio vaccinations so would be useful to illustrate 2024 Gaza Strip polio epidemic. Even if it's not possible to release the image, it may be helpful to suggest the name and sign mentioning polio vaccines are added to the description. Richard Nevell (talk) 18:40, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

hi yes we submitted them yesterday. But ill ad this to the google doc in case if they haven’t looked at already Cinaroot (talk) 19:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

And i have already picked a image for that polio article. And we are getting a good 100 photos. So it will be good.

Wikimedia team plans to ask even more after some time. Cinaroot (talk) 19:05, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. Fingers crossed. Richard Nevell (talk) 19:09, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Your technical move request

Hello Cinaroot, your recent request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests has been removed because it remained inactive for seventy-two hours after being contested. If you would like to proceed with your original request, please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial.

This notification was delivered by TenshiBot. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the top of your current page (your user talk page) TenshiBot (talk) 12:00, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for page move

Many thanks for the Ancient Aliens (TV series) page move! Considered doing it in the past and always talked myself out of it. Thosbsamsgom (talk) 18:28, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your bold move of Ancient Aliens has been reverted because an editor has found it to be controversial. Per Wikipedia:Requested moves, a move request must be placed on the article's talk page, and the request be open for discussion for seven days, "if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested". If you believe that this move is appropriate, please initiate such a discussion to form the appropriate consensus. Again, please note that moving a page with a longstanding title and/or a large number of incoming links is more likely to be considered controversial, and may be contested. Note that such consensus is particularly required before moving a title with incoming links in order to create a disambiguation page at that title. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:43, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Most TV series use a naming convention that includes the phrase "TV series." This makes them easy to identify at a glance without needing further reading ( via google etc.. ). However, I don't think it's worth debating the straightforward change you reversed. Cinaroot (talk) 23:43, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

The naming convention for TV series says otherwise, at the very top:

As is the general practice across Wikipedia, the article title for any topic related to television should simply be the most common word or phrase used to describe that topic. In particular, if the title of a television program is sufficiently unambiguous compared to any other topics or is considered to be the primary topic, then let that also be the title of the article; for example, The Prisoner or Guiding Light.

jlwoodwa (talk) 03:06, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Got it. We can keep it like that. I like these naming's better Suits (American TV series) Probably a personal preference Cinaroot (talk) 05:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)