This is an archive of past discussions with User:Catemcc. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Welcome!
Hello, Catemcc, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 00:38, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Coco Fusco has been reverted. Your edit here to Coco Fusco was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://vimeo.com/79363320) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:38, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Barbara Radice, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past couple of months. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.14% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
Hi there, Catemcc. Glad to see you've become a member of WiR. We look forward to your continued coverage of women in the arts and theatre. Let me know if I can be of any help if you run into problems and feel free to contribute to our WiR talk page.--Ipigott (talk) 21:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
WiR December highlights
Welcome to Women in Red's December 2017 worldwide online editathons.
Hallo Catemcc, thanks for creating the article on Harriet N. Austin, and for adding her to the disambiguation page at Harriet Austin. Just a couple of points:
On the disambiguation page she should be listed in the form of name used as her article title (I've done this) as per WP:MOSDAB
It's useful also to add a redirect from her full name Harriet Newell Austin, which I've done. It's surprising, and pleasing, how often making a link like this turns out to turn a red link blue somewhere in the encyclopedia where perhaps medal winners or something are listed with their full names. It also helps the reader who searches on that form of her name, and helps make it less likely that a future enthusiastic but careless editor will create a duplicate article at that name. So it's good to create redirects from every plausible version of the subject's name - which in the case of multiply-married women with multiple forenames can be quite a lot!
There's a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia but it's an interesting journey. Happy Editing. PamD09:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Feburary 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's February 2018 worldwide online editathons.
Welcome to Wikipedia, Catemcc! Thank you for your contributions. I am BrillLyle and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Hi Cate! Wonderful work on the new entry creation of Carole Byard. I had a draft I had been working on for a while so I hope it was okay that I incorporated some of the information into the article. I love Byard's work, and listened to her oral history and just think she's long overdue for a Wikipedia entry. I am in New York City as well though I don't do A+F, I used to attend their MoMA event back in the day. Anyway, just wanted to say hello and wanted to thank you again! -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 11:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons.
Historically, our March event has been one of the biggest offerings of the year. This year, we are collaborating with two other wiki communities. Our article campaign is the official on-line/virtual node for Art+Feminism. Our image campaign supports the Whose Knowledge? initiative.
Women's History Month 2018
Hello, Catemcc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Looks good. I've added some cleanup for an article about an author: I've added an "authority control" tag (linking to their work on library catalogues), tagged the talk page, added a defaultsort indexing tag and added a few categories. There's actually already an article on her on the French-lanuage version of Wikipedia so I've linked to it. Hope that's all OK!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Catemcc. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
.jpg?lang=en)
.jpg?lang=en)
.jpg?lang=en)
.jpg?lang=en)