User talk:Carbits90

August 2022

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Paramount+ original programming, you may be blocked from editing. BrickMaster02 (talk) 21:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, My Best Friend's Exorcism (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 22:18, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 22:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Owl House (Season 3)

Hi. I'm asking that you please refrain from continually attempting to add the season three listings to "List of The Owl House episodes". Whether or not the listings are correct, or if the source website has been generally reliable in the past, is largely irrelevant. The consistent procedure has been to hold off on adding any leaked episode details until a show/Disney affiliated sourced has announced or confirmed them, regardless of if the episode details turn out to be correct. These specific leaked titles and date have been known for a good couple months, I believe. However, as with previous leaked titles, we have been waiting until there is confirmation from Disney or the show's crew. – Jamie Eilat (talk) 00:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Big City Greens (Season 3)

Hello, I am asking you the same as it's said above but for "List of Big City Greens episodes, refrain of using EIDR, and wait until an official annoucement. Thank you. --Nanopulga (talk) 02:26, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Paramount+ original programming. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BrickMaster02 (talk) 20:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Paramount+ original programming, you may be blocked from editing. BrickMaster02 (talk) 23:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 in American television

Regarding the change for Raven's Home, that doesn't make any sense to me. The fact that the article uses a citation of Anneliese's guest appearance (and the guest spot happened to be last night's episode), and previous articles mention the 100th episodes of iCarly and Henry Danger (even though they aren't listed as such on their episode lists, despite being the 100th produced episodes), it should be added regardless. And that's not without bringing up the episode's title being "Keeping It 100". BrickMaster02 (talk) 13:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm YoungForever. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Inside Job (2021 TV series) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — YoungForever^(talk) 17:23, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Inside Job (2021 TV series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. When it was ordered to series, it was a 20-episode series order for one season. After the part 1 of season 1 was released, Netflix renewed the series for a second season! It does not say 2 seasons when you log into your Netflix account, it just says 2 parts. WP:OTHER. — YoungForever^(talk) 22:30, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Paramount+ original programming, you may be blocked from editing. Knock it off. BrickMaster02 (talk) 16:18, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I'm Οἶδα. I noticed that you recently removed content from Cuckoo (2024 film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Οἶδα (talk) 19:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robot Dreams removal from Neon list

Hello, I see you removed Robot Dreams from the upcoming slate of NEON films, can you please fix that? 6218946rr (talk) 11:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking Mavis Beacon

Hello Carbits90, I was wondering what source you used for the release date of Seeking Mavis Beacon just for a bit of confirmation. 6218946rr (talk) 16:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Meghann Fahy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 14:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Broadway theatre, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 08:24, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to North Star (2023 film). This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 02:11, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at North Star (2023 film), you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 02:11, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at O'Dessa, you may be blocked from editing. BOVINEBOY2008 01:20, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at The Man with the Bag (film). BOVINEBOY2008 10:35, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not revert to an earlier runtime as you did in this diff. Films go by the classification website runtime, not by what the studio wants us to call it. Trailblazer101 (talk) 12:01, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:24, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Please do not change facts on Wikipedia articles until you first cite your sources. See WP:V. Also, when something has not happened yet, like a show's new production, it is only a plan. The event is merely a possibility in the future. It can be cancelled, postponed, etc. So we can say that there is a "planned" production that is scheduled, set, expected to open in the future. See WP:CRYSTAL. It is also not helpful to mention cast replacements until they actually begin playing the role, because their performance could similarly be cancelled or postponed. -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:50, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Summer I Turned Pretty (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 00:13, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bite Me Tour (Reneé Rapp)

Hello, Carbits90,

Thank you for creating Bite Me Tour (Reneé Rapp).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please provide WP:RS, WP:IS.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|QEnigma}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

QEnigma (talk) 19:37, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:55, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. livelikemusic (TALK!) 03:46, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for refusal to add valid sources and a lack of communication..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 04:05, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can respond at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Continued addition of unsourced/poorly sourced content to articles by Carbits90. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 04:08, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carbits90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@CambridgeBayWeather: Hi. I would like you to please consider unbanning me. First of all, I want to make it clear that since I joined Wikipedia, the only thing that I wanted to do was edit towards the greater benefit of this encyclopedia. I had never created a page here before up until this week with the article for Reneé Rapp's upcoming Bite Me Tour and only wanted to make said article because I had thought it was very important information that deserved to have a place here on this website. On the Bite Me Tour page, I was confused why livelikemusic kept constantly saying that I was adding unsourced information into the page when all of the information in my background section of the page had sources that livelikemusic used in the page for the album Bite Me and also other sources I found and included too. After being on here for a while now, I had no idea what the in use tag was and thought that a creator of a page could still edit the page while the tag was still put in place. I felt the need to speak in all caps and shout because I was so confused as to why livelikemusic kept saying I was providing unsourced content when I constantly was providing creditable sources on the page. My instance of poorly sourced content yesterday though that livelikemusic highlighted on the Bite Me album page should not have happened. However, once livelikemusic called me out on my edit yesterday on Reneé's personal page here in regards to the Everything to Everyone: The First Shows tour, I immediately fixed my mistake and provided a source as to why I made that disruptive edit. I will admit that I have made way too many unsourced or poorly sourced edits during my time here on Wikipedia but now it is the time that I finally want to acknowledge and learn from these mistakes by finally communicating the reasons behind what led to all of this occurring. If you decide to unblock/unban me, I intend to leave Wikipedia for good and never come back and make sure that the users making and editing articles are qualified ones who actually are experienced and understand every rule behind what they are doing like livelikemusic and yourself. I had tried to cite examples of the differences between my edits and livelikemusic's edits with sources on the Bite Me Tour article just now, but because I clearly do not know how to do this correctly which is why I would really just like to be unbanned and leave Wikipedia. I used to really enjoy editing on here but I need to stop editing for good. Thank you for reading this and I hope that you will consider unbanning me so I can finally never come back and you will never see me on here ever again. I really do undstand that I was blocked for this repetitive behavior creating too many unsourced edits but now that I have no desire to continue editing once I am unbanned, this behavior and reputation I have created for myself on here will no longer be around. Carbits90 (Talk) 21:18, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's too soon for this request. You need to convince the community over at WP:ANI that your block should be lifted. In any case, you've stated you plan to leave Wikipedia, so there's no reason to consider lifting the block. Yamla (talk) 21:43, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Signature errors

Please update your signature, it has unclosed tags and mismatched tags which is reporting tracked errors each time you comment.

Current:

''' <span style="font-size:95%;">[[User:Carbits90|Carbits90]]</span> <span style="font-size:98%;">([[User talk:Carbits90|'''''Talk''''']])</sup>

Please change to:

<span style="font-size:95%;">[[User:Carbits90|'''Carbits90''']]</span> <span style="font-size:98%;">([[User talk:Carbits90|'''''Talk''''']])</span>

Thank you and hope you have a nice weekend, Zinnober9 (talk) 23:59, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Superache Tour.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Superache Tour.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]