User talk:Billion Editz

Manga section as an own section

Hi. I've noticed that in several articles you have moved the 'Manga' subsection from 'Media' section to leave it as an own section. Note that per WP:MOS-AM, 'Media' section "can include, as appropriate, separate subsections for information on the original version of the work, as well as any related anime series/OVAs, manga, novels, films, video games, and other media (such as soundtracks and drama CDs)." Therefore, this is the standard and there's nothing wrong with the sorting. So I kindly ask you not to do it again, or at least explain your reasons for doing so. Xexerss (talk) 00:54, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Psylocke never been this film! Just a character has similar powers but actual character! 2600:1700:7773:A510:4167:FB93:D088:BDBF (talk) 08:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi, I see you have been making quite a few edits to Marvel-related pages which are on my watchlist. I have noticed that you often do not leave an edit summary explaining what you have changed. This is something that is expected for most, if not all, edits and is a good habit to get into. See Help:Edit summary for more details. Thanks, adamstom97 (talk) 07:36, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boruto. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 21:17, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Billion Editz! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect changing of redirects

If you plan to hijacks redirects, you need to MOVE the page first, not create a new one as the history of the page needs to be preserved and it also moves the watch lists. If this happens again, I will revert all changes. Gonnym (talk) 14:24, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copying/moving content within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Characters of the Marvel Cinematic Universe: M–Z into Characters of the Marvel Cinematic Universe: A–L. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 10:42, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Billion Editz, please read what Diannaa has posted above. When moving content between articles you need to provide attribution for the text. REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 13:08, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Improper hijacking of redirects

Hey, if you plan on redirecting redirect pages with incoming links like you did at Wilfred Nagel and don't follow the correct procedure, I will revert it next time instead of cleaning up after you. A redirect first should be moved, keeping the edit history, then all incoming links should be fixed. Gonnym (talk) 15:44, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]