Jump to content

User talk:Beylarbey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murder of Omar Faruk Tripura (April 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Old-AgedKid was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Old-AgedKid (talk) 11:43, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Beylarbey! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Old-AgedKid (talk) 11:43, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Mir Jumla II, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:18, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the valuable information. Beylarbey (talk) 13:27, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murder of Omar Faruk Tripura (April 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Imwin567 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not so notable even within the country.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Imwin567 (talk) 14:10, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Stop icon Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Somajyoti ✉ 08:22, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your own edit history says the radical idea that you are trying to spread. Trying to manipulate Wikipedia, vandalise and removing truths. Covering them with misinformations. Look at yourself first. Beylarbey (talk) 08:28, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Prothom Alo, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Meghmollar2017 (UTC) — 16:54, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hi Beylarbey! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Sack of Somnath several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Sack of Somnath, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Hionsa (talk) 07:55, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 Shahbag protest, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Daily Star, Independent Television and International Crimes Tribunal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mir Jumla

[edit]

The article Mir Jumla's invasion of Assam describes an invasion, not a conquest. Please do not change it. The article name itself is about an invasion. Even during the occupation of the capital, Mir Jumla had no control of Assam; and control was non-existent after he left Assam. The Koch king recovered his capital in 1662 itself. Chaipau (talk) 06:16, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

[edit]

Please avoid engaging in an edit war over minor issues. I have reverted your edit. What is the point of removing content from the beginning and then adding the same thing at the end? Also, there's no need to add excessive wikilinks. The 2013 Shapla Square protests are already linked through the Siege of Dhaka article, and the Commissions have already been wikilinked multiple times.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 09:28, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mir Jumla's invasion of Assam - failed verification

[edit]

Here [1] you removed the failed verification tag without addressing the issue. Please look WP:TEMPREMOVE on when you can remove maintenance tags. Chaipau (talk) 17:22, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Sack of Somnath, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Hionsa (talk) 04:56, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Scroll through the pages and then judge what is disruptive and what's not. Thanks. Beylarbey (talk) 07:36, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Beylarbey! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Kherua Mosque, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://en.banglapedia.org/index.php/Kherua_Mosque, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Kherua Mosque saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! UtherSRG (talk) 21:06, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Beylarbey (talk) 06:22, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics alert - India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan

[edit]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Chaipau (talk) 22:12, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

a question

[edit]

Hello, thank you for your efforts, I have a question about a person named Abul Qasim Simjuri that you mention in your articles. Was he closely related to Abu Ali Simjuri?تبرستانی (talk) 05:15, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Abu'l Qasim Simjuri is the brother of Abu Ali Simjuri. Check — The Life and Times of Sultan Mahmud of Ghazna (1931), p. 32 Beylarbey (talk) 11:35, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Army of the mughal empire

[edit]

Hello. Can you add Mughal Central Asia campaign and Siege of Nagpur to the history section of Army of the Mughal Empire?

Thanks before 118.136.204.158 (talk) 23:01, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Army of the Mughal Empire 2

[edit]

hello again. Could you help more? Please insert Battle of Tilpat (1669) just under the Gokula Singh rebellion 118.136.204.158 (talk) 22:31, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Beylarbey. Thank you for your work on Gumti Darwaza. Another editor, Bakhtar40, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Need more citations.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bakhtar40}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bakhtar40 (talk) 07:32, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Kara-Khanid invasion of Khorasan has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. I understand that there may have been some confusion about the source's copyright status, given its publication by a UN agency. However, the publishers clearly assert copyright on the second page, and I cannot find any provision online for releasing UNESCO publications into the public domain. Please be more careful going forward. Thanks. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 13:13, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Mirebeau

[edit]

Two quick things: articles older than 90 days can't be draftified, and the article clearly has sources that it cites, those short citations just lack certain information about said sources. Remsense 🌈 论 14:15, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The short citations does not link to any works. They don't target the corresponding books or any sources because there is no sources. So how are readers going to verify information? Just last name and year is not enough for general readers. Beylarbey (talk) 14:17, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Lahore (1043) (August 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ghaznavid campaigns in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chamundaraja.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghaznavid conquest of Multan has been accepted

[edit]
Ghaznavid conquest of Multan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TurboSuperA+[talk] 08:34, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:05, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Third Maratha invasion of Bengal moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Third Maratha invasion of Bengal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and require WP:RS, WP:IS for WP:V and refer to WP:REFB on how to cite sources properly. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma 论 07:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Alivardi Khan when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 09:05, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Beylarbey. Thank you for your work on Siege of Barabati (1745). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for this article about the Marathas! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 12:16, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Ponda (1666) has been accepted

[edit]
Siege of Ponda (1666), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 14:59, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Beylarbey&oldid=1318878505"